Volunteers in Name Only: Implications of Court‐Mandated Service on Volunteer Management

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard M. Clerkin, Jerrell D. Coggburn, Kara L. Lawrence
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867006652282044416
author Richard M. Clerkin
Jerrell D. Coggburn
Kara L. Lawrence
author_facet Richard M. Clerkin
Jerrell D. Coggburn
Kara L. Lawrence
Richard M. Clerkin
Jerrell D. Coggburn
Kara L. Lawrence
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Volunteers in Name Only: Implications of Court‐Mandated Service on Volunteer Management Richard M. Clerkin Jerrell D. Coggburn Kara L. Lawrence Nonprofit Management and Leadership ABSTRACTFor nonprofits facing a shifting volunteer base and pressure to engage volunteers in new ways, mandatory service presents both opportunities and challenges for volunteer management that are similar yet distinct from episodic volunteers. In this manuscript, we use semi‐structured interview data from a sample of 26 nonprofit organizations to explore why and how nonprofits use court‐mandated volunteers (CMs). We find that nonprofits base their decisions on whether and how to use CMs on instrumental, expressive, and affiliative considerations. Our findings suggest that nonprofits who use CMs perceive that engaging with CMs aligns with their mission, can accommodate many volunteer hours in a short amount of time, and possess the capacity to effectively manage CMs. However, when nonprofits choose to use CMs, especially those with full‐time volunteer managers, they utilize them differently than traditional volunteers, tending to put them in sweat roles segregated from other volunteers and service beneficiaries. This differential use of CMs raises important concerns about whether this sort of mandated service can achieve its purpose of connecting CMs to their communities to curb recidivism. Further, it challenges the very notion of what it means to be a volunteer from both the coercive nature of the relationship and how this labor is used, leading us to consider individuals engaging in mandated service as volunteers in name only. 10.1002/nml.21649 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nml.21649
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_nml_21649
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Volunteers in Name Only: Implications of Court‐Mandated Service on Volunteer Management
Richard M. Clerkin
Jerrell D. Coggburn
Kara L. Lawrence
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Volunteers in Name Only: Implications of Court‐Mandated Service on Volunteer Management Richard M. Clerkin Jerrell D. Coggburn Kara L. Lawrence Nonprofit Management and Leadership ABSTRACTFor nonprofits facing a shifting volunteer base and pressure to engage volunteers in new ways, mandatory service presents both opportunities and challenges for volunteer management that are similar yet distinct from episodic volunteers. In this manuscript, we use semi‐structured interview data from a sample of 26 nonprofit organizations to explore why and how nonprofits use court‐mandated volunteers (CMs). We find that nonprofits base their decisions on whether and how to use CMs on instrumental, expressive, and affiliative considerations. Our findings suggest that nonprofits who use CMs perceive that engaging with CMs aligns with their mission, can accommodate many volunteer hours in a short amount of time, and possess the capacity to effectively manage CMs. However, when nonprofits choose to use CMs, especially those with full‐time volunteer managers, they utilize them differently than traditional volunteers, tending to put them in sweat roles segregated from other volunteers and service beneficiaries. This differential use of CMs raises important concerns about whether this sort of mandated service can achieve its purpose of connecting CMs to their communities to curb recidivism. Further, it challenges the very notion of what it means to be a volunteer from both the coercive nature of the relationship and how this labor is used, leading us to consider individuals engaging in mandated service as volunteers in name only. 10.1002/nml.21649 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Volunteers in Name Only: Implications of Court‐Mandated Service on Volunteer Management
topic Nonprofit Management and Leadership
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nml.21649