Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett, Tirissa J. Reid, Edmond P. Wickham, Judith Korner, Dana R. Brittan, Kimberly A. Gudzune
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.70013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867017275256602624
author Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett
Tirissa J. Reid
Edmond P. Wickham
Judith Korner
Dana R. Brittan
Kimberly A. Gudzune
author_facet Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett
Tirissa J. Reid
Edmond P. Wickham
Judith Korner
Dana R. Brittan
Kimberly A. Gudzune
Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett
Tirissa J. Reid
Edmond P. Wickham
Judith Korner
Dana R. Brittan
Kimberly A. Gudzune
collection Wiley Open Access
contents An Update on the American Board of Obesity Medicine ( ABOM ): 2017–2024 Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett Tirissa J. Reid Edmond P. Wickham Judith Korner Dana R. Brittan Kimberly A. Gudzune Obesity ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to describe the characteristics of American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM) physician diplomates over the last 8 years (2017–2024). Methods Using the ABOM database, we conducted a cross‐sectional study of physicians who achieved initial ABOM certification between 2017 and 2024. Characteristics included demographics, primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience, patient population, and practice setting. We conducted descriptive analyses and compared current characteristics with estimates extracted from the published ABOM 5‐year report (2012–2016). Results Overall, 8640 physicians achieved initial ABOM certification between 2017 and 2024; 2068 achieved certification between 2012 and 2016. Between the 2012–2016 and 2017–2024 groups, notable differences were increases in physicians under age 40 years (22.7% vs. 47.6%, respectively), women (52.8% vs. 64.0%, respectively), and practicing obesity medicine for less than 2 years at initial certification (40.2% vs. 68.3%, respectively). The most common primary medical specialties were internal medicine (32.4%), family medicine (29.2%), and internal medicine subspecialties (14.2%). Conclusions We found that recent ABOM diplomates are likely entering the field earlier in their careers and with fewer years of obesity medicine experience than the initial group. Future investigation is needed to understand how ABOM and other obesity organizations can best support these physicians in their transition to obesity medicine clinical practice. 10.1002/oby.70013 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/oby.70013
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_oby_70013
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle An Update on the American Board of Obesity Medicine ( ABOM ): 2017–2024
Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett
Tirissa J. Reid
Edmond P. Wickham
Judith Korner
Dana R. Brittan
Kimberly A. Gudzune
Obesity
An Update on the American Board of Obesity Medicine ( ABOM ): 2017–2024 Brianna Johnson‐Rabbett Tirissa J. Reid Edmond P. Wickham Judith Korner Dana R. Brittan Kimberly A. Gudzune Obesity ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to describe the characteristics of American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM) physician diplomates over the last 8 years (2017–2024). Methods Using the ABOM database, we conducted a cross‐sectional study of physicians who achieved initial ABOM certification between 2017 and 2024. Characteristics included demographics, primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience, patient population, and practice setting. We conducted descriptive analyses and compared current characteristics with estimates extracted from the published ABOM 5‐year report (2012–2016). Results Overall, 8640 physicians achieved initial ABOM certification between 2017 and 2024; 2068 achieved certification between 2012 and 2016. Between the 2012–2016 and 2017–2024 groups, notable differences were increases in physicians under age 40 years (22.7% vs. 47.6%, respectively), women (52.8% vs. 64.0%, respectively), and practicing obesity medicine for less than 2 years at initial certification (40.2% vs. 68.3%, respectively). The most common primary medical specialties were internal medicine (32.4%), family medicine (29.2%), and internal medicine subspecialties (14.2%). Conclusions We found that recent ABOM diplomates are likely entering the field earlier in their careers and with fewer years of obesity medicine experience than the initial group. Future investigation is needed to understand how ABOM and other obesity organizations can best support these physicians in their transition to obesity medicine clinical practice. 10.1002/oby.70013 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title An Update on the American Board of Obesity Medicine ( ABOM ): 2017–2024
topic Obesity
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.70013