Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krystelle Sioufi, Aaron David Haynes, Paul W. Gidley, Anastasios Maniakas, Dianna Roberts, Marc‐Elie Nader
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867017641753837568
author Krystelle Sioufi
Aaron David Haynes
Paul W. Gidley
Anastasios Maniakas
Dianna Roberts
Marc‐Elie Nader
author_facet Krystelle Sioufi
Aaron David Haynes
Paul W. Gidley
Anastasios Maniakas
Dianna Roberts
Marc‐Elie Nader
Krystelle Sioufi
Aaron David Haynes
Paul W. Gidley
Anastasios Maniakas
Dianna Roberts
Marc‐Elie Nader
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Krystelle Sioufi Aaron David Haynes Paul W. Gidley Anastasios Maniakas Dianna Roberts Marc‐Elie Nader Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTemporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and optimal treatment for advanced cases is uncertain. Our systematic literature review aimed to assess 5‐year survival outcomes for advanced TBSCC across different treatment modalities.Data SourcesEMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science.Review MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines for articles published between January 1989 and June 2023.ResultsThe review yielded 1229 citations of which 31 provided 5‐year survival data for TBSCC. The final analysis included 1289 patients. T classification data was available for 1269 patients and overall stage for 1033 patients. Data for 5‐year overall survival (OS) was 59.6%. Five‐year OS was 81.9% for T1/2 and 47.5% for T3/4 (P < .0001). OS for T1/T2 cancers did not significantly differ between surgery and radiation (100% vs 81.3%, P  = .103). For advanced‐stage disease (T3/T4), there was no statistical difference in OS when comparing surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (OS 50.0%) versus surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) (OS 53.3%) versus definitive CRT (OS 58.1%, P  = .767‐1.000). There was not enough data to assess the role of neoadjuvant CRT.ConclusionMost patients will present with advanced‐stage disease, and nodal metastasis is seen in nearly 22% of patients. This study confirms the prognostic correlation of the current T classification system. Our results suggest that OS did not differ significantly between surgery and XRT for early stage disease, and combined treatment modalities yield similar 5‐year OS for advanced cancers. 10.1002/ohn.678 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ohn.678
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ohn_678
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Krystelle Sioufi
Aaron David Haynes
Paul W. Gidley
Anastasios Maniakas
Dianna Roberts
Marc‐Elie Nader
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Krystelle Sioufi Aaron David Haynes Paul W. Gidley Anastasios Maniakas Dianna Roberts Marc‐Elie Nader Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTemporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and optimal treatment for advanced cases is uncertain. Our systematic literature review aimed to assess 5‐year survival outcomes for advanced TBSCC across different treatment modalities.Data SourcesEMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science.Review MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines for articles published between January 1989 and June 2023.ResultsThe review yielded 1229 citations of which 31 provided 5‐year survival data for TBSCC. The final analysis included 1289 patients. T classification data was available for 1269 patients and overall stage for 1033 patients. Data for 5‐year overall survival (OS) was 59.6%. Five‐year OS was 81.9% for T1/2 and 47.5% for T3/4 (P < .0001). OS for T1/T2 cancers did not significantly differ between surgery and radiation (100% vs 81.3%, P  = .103). For advanced‐stage disease (T3/T4), there was no statistical difference in OS when comparing surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (OS 50.0%) versus surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) (OS 53.3%) versus definitive CRT (OS 58.1%, P  = .767‐1.000). There was not enough data to assess the role of neoadjuvant CRT.ConclusionMost patients will present with advanced‐stage disease, and nodal metastasis is seen in nearly 22% of patients. This study confirms the prognostic correlation of the current T classification system. Our results suggest that OS did not differ significantly between surgery and XRT for early stage disease, and combined treatment modalities yield similar 5‐year OS for advanced cancers. 10.1002/ohn.678 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
topic Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
url https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ohn.678