Elective Neck Dissection in cT1‐4 N0M0 Head and Neck Basaloid Carcinoma

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Aman M. Patel, Afash Haleem, Hassaam S. Choudhry, Robert M. Brody, Jason A. Brant, Ryan M. Carey
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867015925423669248
author Aman M. Patel
Afash Haleem
Hassaam S. Choudhry
Robert M. Brody
Jason A. Brant
Ryan M. Carey
author_facet Aman M. Patel
Afash Haleem
Hassaam S. Choudhry
Robert M. Brody
Jason A. Brant
Ryan M. Carey
Aman M. Patel
Afash Haleem
Hassaam S. Choudhry
Robert M. Brody
Jason A. Brant
Ryan M. Carey
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Elective Neck Dissection in cT1‐4 N0M0 Head and Neck Basaloid Carcinoma Aman M. Patel Afash Haleem Hassaam S. Choudhry Robert M. Brody Jason A. Brant Ryan M. Carey Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) over neck observation in surgically resected cT1‐4 N0M0 head and neck basaloid carcinoma (HNBC).Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingThe 2006 to 2017 hospital‐based National Cancer Database.MethodsPatients with surgically resected cT1‐4 N0M0 HNBC were selected. Linear, binary logistic, Kaplan‐Meier, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.ResultsOf 857 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, the majority were male (77.0%) and white (88.1%) with disease of the oral cavity (21.5%) or oropharynx (42.9%) classified as high grade (76.9%) and cT1‐2 (72.9%). 389 (45.4%) patients underwent END. END utilization between 2006 and 2017 increased for cT1‐2 disease (33.3% vs 56.9%, R2 = .699) but remained relatively constant for cT3‐4 disease (66.7% vs 57.9%, R2 = .062). One‐hundred and fifteen (29.6%) ENDs detected occult nodal metastases (ONMs). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing neck observation and END was 65.6% and 66.8%, respectively (P = .652). END was not associated with improved OS in survival analyses stratified by patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and adjuvant therapy. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57‐0.97, P = .031) was associated with improved OS. END (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71‐1.28, P = .770) and ONM (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78‐1.61, P = .551) were not associated with OS.ConclusionEND is performed in nearly half of patients with HNBC but is not associated with improved OS, even after stratifying survival analyses by patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and adjuvant therapy. The rate of ONM approaching 30%, however, justifies inclusion of END in the surgical management of HNBC. 10.1002/ohn.757 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ohn.757
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ohn_757
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Elective Neck Dissection in cT1‐4 N0M0 Head and Neck Basaloid Carcinoma
Aman M. Patel
Afash Haleem
Hassaam S. Choudhry
Robert M. Brody
Jason A. Brant
Ryan M. Carey
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Elective Neck Dissection in cT1‐4 N0M0 Head and Neck Basaloid Carcinoma Aman M. Patel Afash Haleem Hassaam S. Choudhry Robert M. Brody Jason A. Brant Ryan M. Carey Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) over neck observation in surgically resected cT1‐4 N0M0 head and neck basaloid carcinoma (HNBC).Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingThe 2006 to 2017 hospital‐based National Cancer Database.MethodsPatients with surgically resected cT1‐4 N0M0 HNBC were selected. Linear, binary logistic, Kaplan‐Meier, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.ResultsOf 857 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, the majority were male (77.0%) and white (88.1%) with disease of the oral cavity (21.5%) or oropharynx (42.9%) classified as high grade (76.9%) and cT1‐2 (72.9%). 389 (45.4%) patients underwent END. END utilization between 2006 and 2017 increased for cT1‐2 disease (33.3% vs 56.9%, R2 = .699) but remained relatively constant for cT3‐4 disease (66.7% vs 57.9%, R2 = .062). One‐hundred and fifteen (29.6%) ENDs detected occult nodal metastases (ONMs). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing neck observation and END was 65.6% and 66.8%, respectively (P = .652). END was not associated with improved OS in survival analyses stratified by patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and adjuvant therapy. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57‐0.97, P = .031) was associated with improved OS. END (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71‐1.28, P = .770) and ONM (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78‐1.61, P = .551) were not associated with OS.ConclusionEND is performed in nearly half of patients with HNBC but is not associated with improved OS, even after stratifying survival analyses by patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and adjuvant therapy. The rate of ONM approaching 30%, however, justifies inclusion of END in the surgical management of HNBC. 10.1002/ohn.757 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Elective Neck Dissection in cT1‐4 N0M0 Head and Neck Basaloid Carcinoma
topic Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
url https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ohn.757