Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Christian Hemmerich, Adam Corcoran, Austin L. Johnson, Andrew Wilson, Olivia Orris, Russell Arellanes, Matt Vassar
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ohn.765
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867002360583159808
author Christian Hemmerich
Adam Corcoran
Austin L. Johnson
Andrew Wilson
Olivia Orris
Russell Arellanes
Matt Vassar
author_facet Christian Hemmerich
Adam Corcoran
Austin L. Johnson
Andrew Wilson
Olivia Orris
Russell Arellanes
Matt Vassar
Christian Hemmerich
Adam Corcoran
Austin L. Johnson
Andrew Wilson
Olivia Orris
Russell Arellanes
Matt Vassar
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Reporting of Complications in Rhinoplasty Randomized Controlled Trials: An Analysis Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist Christian Hemmerich Adam Corcoran Austin L. Johnson Andrew Wilson Olivia Orris Russell Arellanes Matt Vassar Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the completeness of adverse event (AE) reporting in randomized control trials (RCTs) focused on rhinoplasty, using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension for Harms checklist.Study DesignA cross‐sectional design was employed to review RCTs related to rhinoplasty published between January 1, 2005, and January 28, 2022.SettingThe study analyzed clinical trials on rhinoplasty retrieved from PubMed.MethodsWe performed a comprehension search on PubMed, blind and duplicate screening, and data extraction. Adherence to the 18 recommendations of the CONSORT Extension for Harms was evaluated, with 1 point assigned for each adhered item. Percent adherence was calculated based on the 18 points, taking into account the multiple subcategories within some recommendations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adherence—including frequencies, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsOur search returned 240 articles, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. No RCTs adhered to all 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items. Twenty‐six (26/56, 46.4%) adhered to ≥50% of the items, and 30 (30/56, 53.6%) adhered to ≥33.3% of the items. Seven (7/56, 12.5%) RCTs adhered to no items. Across all RCTs, the average number of CONSORT‐Harms items adhered to was 7.2 (7.2/18, 40.0%). The most adhered to item was item 10. Discussion balanced with regard to efficacy and AEs (80.4%, [70.0‐90.8]).ConclusionThis study highlights the inadequacy of AE reporting in rhinoplasty RCTs according to CONSORT‐Harms guidelines. Urgent efforts are required to bridge this reporting gap and enhance transparency in surgical research, ultimately safeguarding patient well‐being. 10.1002/ohn.765 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ohn.765
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_ohn_765
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Reporting of Complications in Rhinoplasty Randomized Controlled Trials: An Analysis Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist
Christian Hemmerich
Adam Corcoran
Austin L. Johnson
Andrew Wilson
Olivia Orris
Russell Arellanes
Matt Vassar
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Reporting of Complications in Rhinoplasty Randomized Controlled Trials: An Analysis Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist Christian Hemmerich Adam Corcoran Austin L. Johnson Andrew Wilson Olivia Orris Russell Arellanes Matt Vassar Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the completeness of adverse event (AE) reporting in randomized control trials (RCTs) focused on rhinoplasty, using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension for Harms checklist.Study DesignA cross‐sectional design was employed to review RCTs related to rhinoplasty published between January 1, 2005, and January 28, 2022.SettingThe study analyzed clinical trials on rhinoplasty retrieved from PubMed.MethodsWe performed a comprehension search on PubMed, blind and duplicate screening, and data extraction. Adherence to the 18 recommendations of the CONSORT Extension for Harms was evaluated, with 1 point assigned for each adhered item. Percent adherence was calculated based on the 18 points, taking into account the multiple subcategories within some recommendations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adherence—including frequencies, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsOur search returned 240 articles, of which 56 met inclusion criteria. No RCTs adhered to all 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items. Twenty‐six (26/56, 46.4%) adhered to ≥50% of the items, and 30 (30/56, 53.6%) adhered to ≥33.3% of the items. Seven (7/56, 12.5%) RCTs adhered to no items. Across all RCTs, the average number of CONSORT‐Harms items adhered to was 7.2 (7.2/18, 40.0%). The most adhered to item was item 10. Discussion balanced with regard to efficacy and AEs (80.4%, [70.0‐90.8]).ConclusionThis study highlights the inadequacy of AE reporting in rhinoplasty RCTs according to CONSORT‐Harms guidelines. Urgent efforts are required to bridge this reporting gap and enhance transparency in surgical research, ultimately safeguarding patient well‐being. 10.1002/ohn.765 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Reporting of Complications in Rhinoplasty Randomized Controlled Trials: An Analysis Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist
topic Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
url https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ohn.765