Association of Safety‐Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867012250737311744 |
|---|---|
| author | Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John |
| author_facet | Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Association of Safety‐Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTo assess perioperative and readmission outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery at safety‐net hospitals (SNHs) in a modern cohort.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingNationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), 2010 to 2019.MethodsAll elective adult (≥18 years) admissions involving HNCA resection were identified from the NRD. To calculate safety‐net burden, the proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients admitted to each hospital for any indication was tabulated annually, with centers in the highest quartile defined as SNHs. To perform risk adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, multivariable regression models were developed.ResultsOf an estimated 133,018 head and neck surgical patients, 26.5% (n = 35,268) received treatment at a SNH. Utilization of SNHs increased over the decade‐long study period, with 29.8% of individuals treated at these sites in 2019. After multivariable adjustment, several patient factors were noted to be associated with SNHs, including younger age, lower comorbidity burden, and income within the lowest quartile. Although incidence of adverse events decreased at both SNHs and non‐SNHs during the study period, treatment at SNHs remained associated with these events after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.08‐1.28, P < .001).ConclusionSNHs continue to provide valuable specialty care to underserved populations, often with limited financial resources. Despite promising results from prior decades demonstrating comparable perioperative outcomes, the present study noted increased adverse events following HNCA surgery at these sites. Such findings underscore the need for continued advocacy to secure necessary funding for these centers. 10.1002/ohn.796 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ohn.796 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_ohn_796 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Association of Safety‐Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Association of Safety‐Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations Josef Madrigal Laith Mukdad Arjun Verma Peyman Benharash Maie A. St. John Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery AbstractObjectiveTo assess perioperative and readmission outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery at safety‐net hospitals (SNHs) in a modern cohort.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingNationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), 2010 to 2019.MethodsAll elective adult (≥18 years) admissions involving HNCA resection were identified from the NRD. To calculate safety‐net burden, the proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients admitted to each hospital for any indication was tabulated annually, with centers in the highest quartile defined as SNHs. To perform risk adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, multivariable regression models were developed.ResultsOf an estimated 133,018 head and neck surgical patients, 26.5% (n = 35,268) received treatment at a SNH. Utilization of SNHs increased over the decade‐long study period, with 29.8% of individuals treated at these sites in 2019. After multivariable adjustment, several patient factors were noted to be associated with SNHs, including younger age, lower comorbidity burden, and income within the lowest quartile. Although incidence of adverse events decreased at both SNHs and non‐SNHs during the study period, treatment at SNHs remained associated with these events after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.08‐1.28, P < .001).ConclusionSNHs continue to provide valuable specialty care to underserved populations, often with limited financial resources. Despite promising results from prior decades demonstrating comparable perioperative outcomes, the present study noted increased adverse events following HNCA surgery at these sites. Such findings underscore the need for continued advocacy to secure necessary funding for these centers. 10.1002/ohn.796 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title | Association of Safety‐Net Hospital Status With Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Operations |
| topic | Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery |
| url | https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ohn.796 |