Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pbc.32096 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1867004139837325312 |
|---|---|
| author | Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat |
| author_facet | Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Two Surveys, 16 Years Apart: Comparing Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use by Children With Cancer in Jordan Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat Pediatric Blood & Cancer ABSTRACT Background Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) is commonly used by children with cancer alongside conventional treatments. However, data on its use in Jordan remain limited. This study aimed to assess the current prevalence, types, motivations, and disclosure rates of T&CM use in Jordan, and to compare these findings with those from the original 2008 study conducted in the same setting. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted in the pediatric oncology department at King Hussein Cancer Center between November 2023 and May 2024. A brief proxy‐report T&CM questionnaire with evidence of validity and reliability was used. Results A total of 85 patients participated (response rate = 85%). Overall, 29.4% reported T&CM use, primarily for perceived safety (52%), managing cancer‐related symptoms (44%), and potential therapeutic benefit (40%). Nutritional (68%) and psychological (24%) approaches were the most used modalities. Disclosure of T&CM use to healthcare providers was reported by 75% of users. Reasons for non‐use included a lack of recommendation by healthcare providers and limited awareness. A statistically significant association was found between T&CM use and current therapy stage, with higher use among patients in active treatment. No other demographic or clinical variables were significantly associated with T&CM use. Conclusion Compared to earlier findings, this study shows a lower prevalence of T&CM use and a higher disclosure rate, suggesting improved communication and awareness. Parents used T&CM to complement conventional care rather than as an alternative. These findings underscore the importance of integrating discussions about T&CM into pediatric oncology care to support safe and informed use. 10.1002/pbc.32096 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pbc.32096 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_pbc_32096 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Two Surveys, 16 Years Apart: Comparing Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use by Children With Cancer in Jordan Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat Pediatric Blood & Cancer Two Surveys, 16 Years Apart: Comparing Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use by Children With Cancer in Jordan Murad Sawalha Anwar Alnaasan Anas Alsharawneh Ahmed Farrag Mohammad R. Alqudimat Pediatric Blood & Cancer ABSTRACT Background Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) is commonly used by children with cancer alongside conventional treatments. However, data on its use in Jordan remain limited. This study aimed to assess the current prevalence, types, motivations, and disclosure rates of T&CM use in Jordan, and to compare these findings with those from the original 2008 study conducted in the same setting. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted in the pediatric oncology department at King Hussein Cancer Center between November 2023 and May 2024. A brief proxy‐report T&CM questionnaire with evidence of validity and reliability was used. Results A total of 85 patients participated (response rate = 85%). Overall, 29.4% reported T&CM use, primarily for perceived safety (52%), managing cancer‐related symptoms (44%), and potential therapeutic benefit (40%). Nutritional (68%) and psychological (24%) approaches were the most used modalities. Disclosure of T&CM use to healthcare providers was reported by 75% of users. Reasons for non‐use included a lack of recommendation by healthcare providers and limited awareness. A statistically significant association was found between T&CM use and current therapy stage, with higher use among patients in active treatment. No other demographic or clinical variables were significantly associated with T&CM use. Conclusion Compared to earlier findings, this study shows a lower prevalence of T&CM use and a higher disclosure rate, suggesting improved communication and awareness. Parents used T&CM to complement conventional care rather than as an alternative. These findings underscore the importance of integrating discussions about T&CM into pediatric oncology care to support safe and informed use. 10.1002/pbc.32096 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Two Surveys, 16 Years Apart: Comparing Traditional and Complementary Medicine Use by Children With Cancer in Jordan |
| topic | Pediatric Blood & Cancer |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pbc.32096 |