Effect of antibacterial masterbatches selection on the crystal structure and properties of nanosilver composite materials
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo Open Access |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1867003804624355328 |
|---|---|
| author | Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi |
| author_facet | Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Effect of antibacterial masterbatches selection on the crystal structure and properties of nanosilver composite materials Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi Polymer Engineering & Science AbstractThe distribution of nanosilver in composite materials with two different matrices is related to the selection of antibacterial masterbatches, which has a profound impact on the antibacterial effectiveness of the composite materials. This study utilized ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) and polypropylene (PP) as base materials to fabricate two types of nanosilver composite materials (C1‐EVA/PP and C2‐EVA/PPP) employing varying methods of antimicrobial masterbatches incorporation. Additionally, EVA‐Ag and PP‐Ag nanosilver composite materials were fabricated via melt blending, along with corresponding neat materials and blends (EVA, PP, and C0‐EVA/PP) for comparison. The study results indicate that the addition of nanosilver did not affect the functional groups of either the neat materials and the EVA/PP blends. SEM analysis revealed that nanosilver was dispersed unevenly in the C1‐EVA/PP substrate, while it was more uniformly distributed in the C2‐EVA/PP substrate. In the antibacterial test, the antibacterial rate of C2‐EVA/PP was higher than that of C1‐EVA/PP (56.0% vs. 40.0%). However, all silver‐containing composite materials did not exhibit antibacterial properties in the agar diffusion test. Additionally, nanosilver exhibited an induced crystallization effect on the PP phase of the C2‐EVA/PP composite material, increasing its Tc2 by 0.8°C. Compared with pure PP, the long period of PP‐Ag increased by 0.7 nm, and its impact resistance improved by 13.8%. By comparison, the long period of EVA‐Ag composite materials increased by only 0.2 nm compared to pure EVA. Both C1‐EVA/PP and C2‐EVA/PP composite materials showed 0.3 nm increase in long period compared to C0‐EVA/PP, with their impact resistance improving by 3.1% and 10.3%, respectively, compared to C0‐EVA/PP. The introduction of nanosilver increased the storage modulus, loss modulus, and apparent viscosity of EVA/PP blends. Optical performance analysis shows that nanosilver increases the internal haze of C1‐EVA/PPP by 60% while reducing the transmittance by 0.3%. The effect of nanosilver on the optical properties of C2‐EVA/PPP composites is relatively small. Therefore, this study provides theoretical guidance for the selection of processing methods for dual‐phase antibacterial materials.Highlights Different antibacterial masterbatch impacts silver distribution in composites. The addition of nanosilver can improve the impact performance of materials. Two process methods were used to prepare low‐silver content composite materials. The antibacterial rate of C2‐EVA/PP is higher than C1‐EVA/PP (56% vs. 40%). This study guides the processing methods for dual‐phase antibacterial materials. 10.1002/pen.26913 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pen.26913 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_pen_26913 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Effect of antibacterial masterbatches selection on the crystal structure and properties of nanosilver composite materials Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi Polymer Engineering & Science Effect of antibacterial masterbatches selection on the crystal structure and properties of nanosilver composite materials Chengcheng Tian Yang Li Li‐Zhi Liu Yuanxia Wang Ying Shi Polymer Engineering & Science AbstractThe distribution of nanosilver in composite materials with two different matrices is related to the selection of antibacterial masterbatches, which has a profound impact on the antibacterial effectiveness of the composite materials. This study utilized ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) and polypropylene (PP) as base materials to fabricate two types of nanosilver composite materials (C1‐EVA/PP and C2‐EVA/PPP) employing varying methods of antimicrobial masterbatches incorporation. Additionally, EVA‐Ag and PP‐Ag nanosilver composite materials were fabricated via melt blending, along with corresponding neat materials and blends (EVA, PP, and C0‐EVA/PP) for comparison. The study results indicate that the addition of nanosilver did not affect the functional groups of either the neat materials and the EVA/PP blends. SEM analysis revealed that nanosilver was dispersed unevenly in the C1‐EVA/PP substrate, while it was more uniformly distributed in the C2‐EVA/PP substrate. In the antibacterial test, the antibacterial rate of C2‐EVA/PP was higher than that of C1‐EVA/PP (56.0% vs. 40.0%). However, all silver‐containing composite materials did not exhibit antibacterial properties in the agar diffusion test. Additionally, nanosilver exhibited an induced crystallization effect on the PP phase of the C2‐EVA/PP composite material, increasing its Tc2 by 0.8°C. Compared with pure PP, the long period of PP‐Ag increased by 0.7 nm, and its impact resistance improved by 13.8%. By comparison, the long period of EVA‐Ag composite materials increased by only 0.2 nm compared to pure EVA. Both C1‐EVA/PP and C2‐EVA/PP composite materials showed 0.3 nm increase in long period compared to C0‐EVA/PP, with their impact resistance improving by 3.1% and 10.3%, respectively, compared to C0‐EVA/PP. The introduction of nanosilver increased the storage modulus, loss modulus, and apparent viscosity of EVA/PP blends. Optical performance analysis shows that nanosilver increases the internal haze of C1‐EVA/PPP by 60% while reducing the transmittance by 0.3%. The effect of nanosilver on the optical properties of C2‐EVA/PPP composites is relatively small. Therefore, this study provides theoretical guidance for the selection of processing methods for dual‐phase antibacterial materials.Highlights Different antibacterial masterbatch impacts silver distribution in composites. The addition of nanosilver can improve the impact performance of materials. Two process methods were used to prepare low‐silver content composite materials. The antibacterial rate of C2‐EVA/PP is higher than C1‐EVA/PP (56% vs. 40%). This study guides the processing methods for dual‐phase antibacterial materials. 10.1002/pen.26913 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Effect of antibacterial masterbatches selection on the crystal structure and properties of nanosilver composite materials |
| topic | Polymer Engineering & Science |
| url | https://4spepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pen.26913 |