Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bianca Kerschbaumer, Eva M. Frießer, Silvia Wallner, Gustav Oberdorfer, Michael Friess, Rolf Breinbauer, Peter Macheroux, Aleksandar Bijelic
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pro.70521
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867019517705584640
author Bianca Kerschbaumer
Eva M. Frießer
Silvia Wallner
Gustav Oberdorfer
Michael Friess
Rolf Breinbauer
Peter Macheroux
Aleksandar Bijelic
author_facet Bianca Kerschbaumer
Eva M. Frießer
Silvia Wallner
Gustav Oberdorfer
Michael Friess
Rolf Breinbauer
Peter Macheroux
Aleksandar Bijelic
Bianca Kerschbaumer
Eva M. Frießer
Silvia Wallner
Gustav Oberdorfer
Michael Friess
Rolf Breinbauer
Peter Macheroux
Aleksandar Bijelic
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH ‐binding motifs in NADPH ‐preferring ene‐reductases Bianca Kerschbaumer Eva M. Frießer Silvia Wallner Gustav Oberdorfer Michael Friess Rolf Breinbauer Peter Macheroux Aleksandar Bijelic Protein Science Abstract Ene‐reductases (ERs) catalyze nicotinamide‐dependent, stereoselective reductions of activated CC bonds. While their catalytic chemistry and applications are well‐explored, cosubstrate (NAD(P)H) binding remains poorly understood. Most ERs strongly prefer NADPH despite lacking canonical dinucleotide‐binding folds and instead employ flexible loop motifs. We recently elucidated the NADPH‐binding mode of the NADPH‐preferring ER Solanum lycopersicum OPR3 ( Sl OPR3), identifying four key residues (R283/R343/Y364/R366) that form two motifs: a 2′‐phosphate (2′‐P)‐binding site (R343/Y364/R366) and a loop 6 (L6)‐mediated adenine clamp (R283/R343). Guided by this model, we analyzed the conservation of these motifs across 51 NADPH‐preferring ERs from different Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) classes by multi‐sequence alignment and homology modeling. Analyses revealed a class‐dependent distribution: class‐II ERs predominantly conserve the OPR3‐like motifs, whereas other classes employ alternative mechanisms, including dimerization‐induced modes. Functional dissection of Sl OPR3 through mutagenesis, kinetics, and crystallography established a functional hierarchy of the motif elements, indicating that R343 and R366 are indispensable for NADPH binding in OPR3‐like ERs, while the adenine clamp acts as a conformation‐sensitive affinity tuner. Ancestral sequence reconstruction revealed the stepwise and convergent assembly of motif elements, culminating in the complete motif set in plant, fungal, and cyanobacterial lineages. Our findings delineate (i) a strict functional hierarchy of NADPH‐binding residues in OPR3‐like ERs, (ii) alternative binding solutions in other OYE classes, and (iii) a convergent evolutionary trajectory, advancing the fundamental understanding of NADPH binding in NADPH‐preferring ERs and offering a modular framework to predict NADPH preference in ERs. 10.1002/pro.70521 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pro.70521
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_pro_70521
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH ‐binding motifs in NADPH ‐preferring ene‐reductases
Bianca Kerschbaumer
Eva M. Frießer
Silvia Wallner
Gustav Oberdorfer
Michael Friess
Rolf Breinbauer
Peter Macheroux
Aleksandar Bijelic
Protein Science
Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH ‐binding motifs in NADPH ‐preferring ene‐reductases Bianca Kerschbaumer Eva M. Frießer Silvia Wallner Gustav Oberdorfer Michael Friess Rolf Breinbauer Peter Macheroux Aleksandar Bijelic Protein Science Abstract Ene‐reductases (ERs) catalyze nicotinamide‐dependent, stereoselective reductions of activated CC bonds. While their catalytic chemistry and applications are well‐explored, cosubstrate (NAD(P)H) binding remains poorly understood. Most ERs strongly prefer NADPH despite lacking canonical dinucleotide‐binding folds and instead employ flexible loop motifs. We recently elucidated the NADPH‐binding mode of the NADPH‐preferring ER Solanum lycopersicum OPR3 ( Sl OPR3), identifying four key residues (R283/R343/Y364/R366) that form two motifs: a 2′‐phosphate (2′‐P)‐binding site (R343/Y364/R366) and a loop 6 (L6)‐mediated adenine clamp (R283/R343). Guided by this model, we analyzed the conservation of these motifs across 51 NADPH‐preferring ERs from different Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) classes by multi‐sequence alignment and homology modeling. Analyses revealed a class‐dependent distribution: class‐II ERs predominantly conserve the OPR3‐like motifs, whereas other classes employ alternative mechanisms, including dimerization‐induced modes. Functional dissection of Sl OPR3 through mutagenesis, kinetics, and crystallography established a functional hierarchy of the motif elements, indicating that R343 and R366 are indispensable for NADPH binding in OPR3‐like ERs, while the adenine clamp acts as a conformation‐sensitive affinity tuner. Ancestral sequence reconstruction revealed the stepwise and convergent assembly of motif elements, culminating in the complete motif set in plant, fungal, and cyanobacterial lineages. Our findings delineate (i) a strict functional hierarchy of NADPH‐binding residues in OPR3‐like ERs, (ii) alternative binding solutions in other OYE classes, and (iii) a convergent evolutionary trajectory, advancing the fundamental understanding of NADPH binding in NADPH‐preferring ERs and offering a modular framework to predict NADPH preference in ERs. 10.1002/pro.70521 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Structural and evolutionary dissection of NADPH ‐binding motifs in NADPH ‐preferring ene‐reductases
topic Protein Science
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pro.70521