III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatjana Škrbić, Achille Giacometti, Trinh X. Hoang, Amos Maritan, Jayanth R. Banavar
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867018226723979264
author Tatjana Škrbić
Achille Giacometti
Trinh X. Hoang
Amos Maritan
Jayanth R. Banavar
author_facet Tatjana Škrbić
Achille Giacometti
Trinh X. Hoang
Amos Maritan
Jayanth R. Banavar
Tatjana Škrbić
Achille Giacometti
Trinh X. Hoang
Amos Maritan
Jayanth R. Banavar
collection Wiley Open Access
contents III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins Tatjana Škrbić Achille Giacometti Trinh X. Hoang Amos Maritan Jayanth R. Banavar Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Abstract We have shown recently that the notion of poking pairwise interactions along a chain provides a unifying framework for understanding the formation of both secondary and the tertiary protein structure based on symmetry and geometry. α‐helices and β‐sheets are found to be special geometries that have systematic poking contacts in a repetitive manner with the contacts being local along the α‐helix and non‐local along a pair of adjacent strands within a β‐sheet. Pairwise poking interactions also govern tertiary structure formation, but they are weaker and there are no special geometrical constraints as in secondary structure formation. Here we demonstrate that protein turns, the most prevalent non‐repetitive structural element in proteins, are instances of local (as in α‐helices) and isolated (non‐repetitive) poking pairwise contacts for which the geometrical constraints are partially relaxed. This simple and purely geometrical definition of protein turns (also sometimes known as reverse turns, β‐turns, β‐bends, hairpin bends, 3 10 bends, kinks, widgets, etc.) provides a simple framework for unifying them. We present the results of a systematic analysis and identify their structural classes as well as their respective amino acid preferences. 10.1002/prot.26671 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prot.26671
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_prot_26671
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins
Tatjana Škrbić
Achille Giacometti
Trinh X. Hoang
Amos Maritan
Jayanth R. Banavar
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins Tatjana Škrbić Achille Giacometti Trinh X. Hoang Amos Maritan Jayanth R. Banavar Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Abstract We have shown recently that the notion of poking pairwise interactions along a chain provides a unifying framework for understanding the formation of both secondary and the tertiary protein structure based on symmetry and geometry. α‐helices and β‐sheets are found to be special geometries that have systematic poking contacts in a repetitive manner with the contacts being local along the α‐helix and non‐local along a pair of adjacent strands within a β‐sheet. Pairwise poking interactions also govern tertiary structure formation, but they are weaker and there are no special geometrical constraints as in secondary structure formation. Here we demonstrate that protein turns, the most prevalent non‐repetitive structural element in proteins, are instances of local (as in α‐helices) and isolated (non‐repetitive) poking pairwise contacts for which the geometrical constraints are partially relaxed. This simple and purely geometrical definition of protein turns (also sometimes known as reverse turns, β‐turns, β‐bends, hairpin bends, 3 10 bends, kinks, widgets, etc.) provides a simple framework for unifying them. We present the results of a systematic analysis and identify their structural classes as well as their respective amino acid preferences. 10.1002/prot.26671 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title III. Geometrical framework for thinking about globular proteins: Turns in proteins
topic Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prot.26671