Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga O. Lebedenko, Mikhail S. Polovinkin, Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia, Nikolai R. Skrynnikov
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prot.26821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867012290379776000
author Olga O. Lebedenko
Mikhail S. Polovinkin
Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia
Nikolai R. Skrynnikov
author_facet Olga O. Lebedenko
Mikhail S. Polovinkin
Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia
Nikolai R. Skrynnikov
Olga O. Lebedenko
Mikhail S. Polovinkin
Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia
Nikolai R. Skrynnikov
collection Wiley Open Access
contents PCANN Program for Structure‐Based Prediction of Protein–Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural‐Network Predictors Olga O. Lebedenko Mikhail S. Polovinkin Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia Nikolai R. Skrynnikov Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics ABSTRACTIn this communication, we introduce a new structure‐based affinity predictor for protein–protein complexes. This predictor, dubbed PCANN (Protein Complex Affinity by Neural Network), uses the ESM‐2 language model to encode the information about protein binding interfaces and graph attention network (GAT) to parlay this information into predictions. In the tests employing two previously unused literature‐extracted datasets, PCANN performed better than the best of the publicly available predictors, BindPPI, with mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.3 versus 1.4 kcal/mol. Further progress in the development of predictors using deep learning models is faced with two problems: (i) the amount of experimental data available to train and test new predictors is limited and (ii) the available data are often not very accurate and lack internal consistency with respect to measurement conditions. These issues can be potentially addressed through an AI‐leveraged literature search followed by careful human curation and by introducing additional parameters to account for variations in experimental conditions. 10.1002/prot.26821 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prot.26821
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_prot_26821
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle PCANN Program for Structure‐Based Prediction of Protein–Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural‐Network Predictors
Olga O. Lebedenko
Mikhail S. Polovinkin
Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia
Nikolai R. Skrynnikov
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
PCANN Program for Structure‐Based Prediction of Protein–Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural‐Network Predictors Olga O. Lebedenko Mikhail S. Polovinkin Anastasiia A. Kazovskaia Nikolai R. Skrynnikov Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics ABSTRACTIn this communication, we introduce a new structure‐based affinity predictor for protein–protein complexes. This predictor, dubbed PCANN (Protein Complex Affinity by Neural Network), uses the ESM‐2 language model to encode the information about protein binding interfaces and graph attention network (GAT) to parlay this information into predictions. In the tests employing two previously unused literature‐extracted datasets, PCANN performed better than the best of the publicly available predictors, BindPPI, with mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.3 versus 1.4 kcal/mol. Further progress in the development of predictors using deep learning models is faced with two problems: (i) the amount of experimental data available to train and test new predictors is limited and (ii) the available data are often not very accurate and lack internal consistency with respect to measurement conditions. These issues can be potentially addressed through an AI‐leveraged literature search followed by careful human curation and by introducing additional parameters to account for variations in experimental conditions. 10.1002/prot.26821 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title PCANN Program for Structure‐Based Prediction of Protein–Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural‐Network Predictors
topic Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prot.26821