Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867006862838202368 |
|---|---|
| author | Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay |
| author_facet | Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay Statistics in Medicine ABSTRACT Stepped wedge cluster‐randomized trial (CRTs) designs randomize clusters of individuals to intervention sequences, ensuring that every cluster eventually transitions from a control period to receive the intervention under study by the end of the study period. The analysis of stepped wedge CRTs is usually more complex than parallel‐arm CRTs due to more complex intra‐cluster correlation structures. A further challenge in the analysis of closed‐cohort stepped wedge CRTs, which follow groups of individuals enrolled in each period longitudinally, is the occurrence of dropout. This is particularly problematic in studies of individuals at high risk for mortality, which causes nonignorable missing outcomes. If not appropriately addressed, missing outcomes from death will erode statistical power, at best, and bias treatment effect estimates, at worst. Joint longitudinal‐survival models can accommodate informative dropout and missingness patterns in longitudinal studies. Specifically, within the joint longitudinal‐survival modeling framework, one directly models the dropout process via a time‐to‐event submodel together with the longitudinal outcome of interest. The two submodels are then linked using a variety of possible association structures. This work extends linear mixed‐effects models by jointly modeling the dropout process to accommodate informative missing outcome data in closed‐cohort stepped wedge CRTs. We focus on constant intervention and general time‐on‐treatment effect parametrizations for the longitudinal submodel and study the performance of the proposed methodology using Monte Carlo simulation under several data‐generating scenarios. We illustrate the joint modeling methodology in practice by reanalyzing data from the “Frail Older Adults: Care in Transition” (ACT) trial, a stepped wedge CRT of a multifaceted geriatric care model versus usual care in 35 primary care practices in the Netherlands. 10.1002/sim.10347 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sim.10347 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1002_sim_10347 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay Statistics in Medicine Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling Alessandro Gasparini Michael J. Crowther Emiel O. Hoogendijk Fan Li Michael O. Harhay Statistics in Medicine ABSTRACT Stepped wedge cluster‐randomized trial (CRTs) designs randomize clusters of individuals to intervention sequences, ensuring that every cluster eventually transitions from a control period to receive the intervention under study by the end of the study period. The analysis of stepped wedge CRTs is usually more complex than parallel‐arm CRTs due to more complex intra‐cluster correlation structures. A further challenge in the analysis of closed‐cohort stepped wedge CRTs, which follow groups of individuals enrolled in each period longitudinally, is the occurrence of dropout. This is particularly problematic in studies of individuals at high risk for mortality, which causes nonignorable missing outcomes. If not appropriately addressed, missing outcomes from death will erode statistical power, at best, and bias treatment effect estimates, at worst. Joint longitudinal‐survival models can accommodate informative dropout and missingness patterns in longitudinal studies. Specifically, within the joint longitudinal‐survival modeling framework, one directly models the dropout process via a time‐to‐event submodel together with the longitudinal outcome of interest. The two submodels are then linked using a variety of possible association structures. This work extends linear mixed‐effects models by jointly modeling the dropout process to accommodate informative missing outcome data in closed‐cohort stepped wedge CRTs. We focus on constant intervention and general time‐on‐treatment effect parametrizations for the longitudinal submodel and study the performance of the proposed methodology using Monte Carlo simulation under several data‐generating scenarios. We illustrate the joint modeling methodology in practice by reanalyzing data from the “Frail Older Adults: Care in Transition” (ACT) trial, a stepped wedge CRT of a multifaceted geriatric care model versus usual care in 35 primary care practices in the Netherlands. 10.1002/sim.10347 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster‐Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling |
| topic | Statistics in Medicine |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.10347 |