Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://incose.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sys.70007 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Managing Variations in Meaning: Guidance for Using “Complexity” and Related Terms Joshua Sutherland Dean Beale Francesco Dazzi Janet Singer Gary Smith Rudolph Oosthuizen Alfonso Lanza Ken Cureton Dorothy McKinney Systems Engineering ABSTRACT The term “Complexity” is widely used across disciplines, where it often represents distinct but related concepts such as complicatedness, emergence, difficulty, uncertainty, and chaos. This variability in usage can create miscommunication and misunderstanding, even within structured organizations like the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). This paper addresses this challenge by offering guidance tailored to three primary audiences—General/Casual, Practitioner, and Research—on using and interpreting “Complexity” effectively across trans‐disciplinary contexts. Unlike efforts that prescribe a single definition, the approach here respects the variety of interpretations while providing techniques and ontologies to clarify usage. To illustrate, the paper compares different “Complexity” definitions, fostering awareness of both the similarities and distinctions. By promoting a common understanding, rather than a definition, this paper lays essential groundwork for future initiatives aimed at developing a unified scientific basis for “Complexity”, enabling clearer, more consistent communication, and application. 10.1002/sys.70007 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/