| _version_ | 1867002829318651905 |
|---|---|
| author | Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou |
| author_facet | Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | The impact of late pregnancy dating on the detection of fetal growth restriction at term Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica AbstractIntroductionThe inaccuracy of late pregnancy dating is often discussed, and the impact on diagnosis of fetal growth restriction is a concern. However, the magnitude and direction of this effect has not previously been demonstrated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of late pregnancy dating by head circumference on the detection of late onset growth restriction, compared to first trimester crown‐rump length dating.Material and methodsThis was a cohort study of 14 013 pregnancies receiving obstetric care at a tertiary center over a three‐year period. Universal scans were performed at 12 weeks, including crown‐rump length; at 20 weeks including fetal biometry; and at 36 weeks, where biometry, umbilical artery doppler and cerebroplacental ratio were used to determine the incidence of fetal growth restriction according to the Delphi consensus. For the entire cohort, the gestational age was first calculated using T1 dating; and was then recalculated using head circumference at 20 weeks (T2 dating); and at 36 weeks (T3 dating). The incidence of fetal growth restriction following T2 and T3 dating was compared to T1 dating using four‐by‐four sensitivity tables.ResultsWhen the cohort was redated from T1 to T2, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 2 weeks (p < 0.001). When the cohort was redated from T1 to T3, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 3 weeks (p < 0.001). T2 dating resulted in fetal growth restriction sensitivity of 80.2% with positive predictive value of 78.8% compared to T1 dating. T3 dating resulted in sensitivity of 8.6% and positive predictive value of 27.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of abnormal CPR remained high despite T2 and T3 redating; 98.0% and 89.4%, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough dating at 11–14 weeks is recommended, late pregnancy dating is sometimes inevitable, and this can prolong the estimated due date by an average of two to three days. One in five pregnancies which would be classified as growth restricted if the pregnancy was dated in the first trimester, will be reclassified as nongrowth restricted following dating at 20 weeks, whereas nine out of 10 pregnancies will be reclassified as non‐growth restricted with 36‐week dating. 10.1111/aogs.14769 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.14769 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_aogs_14769 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | The impact of late pregnancy dating on the detection of fetal growth restriction at term Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica The impact of late pregnancy dating on the detection of fetal growth restriction at term Sam Mathewlynn Despoina Kitmiridou Lawrence Impey Christos Ioannou Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica AbstractIntroductionThe inaccuracy of late pregnancy dating is often discussed, and the impact on diagnosis of fetal growth restriction is a concern. However, the magnitude and direction of this effect has not previously been demonstrated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of late pregnancy dating by head circumference on the detection of late onset growth restriction, compared to first trimester crown‐rump length dating.Material and methodsThis was a cohort study of 14 013 pregnancies receiving obstetric care at a tertiary center over a three‐year period. Universal scans were performed at 12 weeks, including crown‐rump length; at 20 weeks including fetal biometry; and at 36 weeks, where biometry, umbilical artery doppler and cerebroplacental ratio were used to determine the incidence of fetal growth restriction according to the Delphi consensus. For the entire cohort, the gestational age was first calculated using T1 dating; and was then recalculated using head circumference at 20 weeks (T2 dating); and at 36 weeks (T3 dating). The incidence of fetal growth restriction following T2 and T3 dating was compared to T1 dating using four‐by‐four sensitivity tables.ResultsWhen the cohort was redated from T1 to T2, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 2 weeks (p < 0.001). When the cohort was redated from T1 to T3, the median gestation at delivery changed from 40 + 0 to 40 + 3 weeks (p < 0.001). T2 dating resulted in fetal growth restriction sensitivity of 80.2% with positive predictive value of 78.8% compared to T1 dating. T3 dating resulted in sensitivity of 8.6% and positive predictive value of 27.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of abnormal CPR remained high despite T2 and T3 redating; 98.0% and 89.4%, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough dating at 11–14 weeks is recommended, late pregnancy dating is sometimes inevitable, and this can prolong the estimated due date by an average of two to three days. One in five pregnancies which would be classified as growth restricted if the pregnancy was dated in the first trimester, will be reclassified as nongrowth restricted following dating at 20 weeks, whereas nine out of 10 pregnancies will be reclassified as non‐growth restricted with 36‐week dating. 10.1111/aogs.14769 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| title | The impact of late pregnancy dating on the detection of fetal growth restriction at term |
| topic | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica |
| url | https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14769 |