External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre‐eclampsia prediction at 11–14 weeks in an Australian population

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Roshan Selvaratnam, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Andrew McLennan, Jon Hyett, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867004369567744000
author Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Daniel Lorber Rolnik
Roshan Selvaratnam
Fabricio da Silva Costa
Andrew McLennan
Jon Hyett
Helena Teede
Joanne Enticott
author_facet Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Daniel Lorber Rolnik
Roshan Selvaratnam
Fabricio da Silva Costa
Andrew McLennan
Jon Hyett
Helena Teede
Joanne Enticott
Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Daniel Lorber Rolnik
Roshan Selvaratnam
Fabricio da Silva Costa
Andrew McLennan
Jon Hyett
Helena Teede
Joanne Enticott
collection Wiley Open Access
contents External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre‐eclampsia prediction at 11–14 weeks in an Australian population Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh Daniel Lorber Rolnik Roshan Selvaratnam Fabricio da Silva Costa Andrew McLennan Jon Hyett Helena Teede Joanne Enticott Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica AbstractIntroductionPre‐eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first‐trimester preterm pre‐eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population.Material and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre‐eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11–14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre‐eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false‐positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.ResultsOf 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre‐eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30–38) years. Women with pre‐eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA‐PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP‐A compared to those without pre‐eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre‐eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false‐positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP‐A use. Preterm pre‐eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.ConclusionsThe Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre‐eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false‐positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk‐based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies. 10.1111/aogs.70002 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aogs.70002
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_aogs_70002
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre‐eclampsia prediction at 11–14 weeks in an Australian population
Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Daniel Lorber Rolnik
Roshan Selvaratnam
Fabricio da Silva Costa
Andrew McLennan
Jon Hyett
Helena Teede
Joanne Enticott
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre‐eclampsia prediction at 11–14 weeks in an Australian population Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh Daniel Lorber Rolnik Roshan Selvaratnam Fabricio da Silva Costa Andrew McLennan Jon Hyett Helena Teede Joanne Enticott Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica AbstractIntroductionPre‐eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first‐trimester preterm pre‐eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population.Material and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre‐eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11–14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre‐eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false‐positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.ResultsOf 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre‐eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30–38) years. Women with pre‐eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA‐PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP‐A compared to those without pre‐eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre‐eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false‐positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP‐A use. Preterm pre‐eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.ConclusionsThe Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre‐eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false‐positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk‐based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies. 10.1111/aogs.70002 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre‐eclampsia prediction at 11–14 weeks in an Australian population
topic Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
url https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.70002