The impact of accommodation function on the difference between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in adult myopes

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Wang Yuexin, Zhang Yu, Yuan Yifei, Liu Yan, Chen Yueguo
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867004219944337408
author Wang Yuexin
Zhang Yu
Yuan Yifei
Liu Yan
Chen Yueguo
author_facet Wang Yuexin
Zhang Yu
Yuan Yifei
Liu Yan
Chen Yueguo
Wang Yuexin
Zhang Yu
Yuan Yifei
Liu Yan
Chen Yueguo
collection Wiley Open Access
contents The impact of accommodation function on the difference between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in adult myopes Wang Yuexin Zhang Yu Yuan Yifei Liu Yan Chen Yueguo Acta Ophthalmologica AbstractPurposeTo investigate the impact of accommodation function on the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic subjective and automatic refraction in adult myopes.MethodsMyopic patients between 18 and 50 years old evaluated at Peking University Third Hospital who underwent cycloplegic and noncycloplegic automatic and subjective refraction were enrolled. Accommodation function, including negative and positive relative accommodation (PRA/NRA) and accommodation response (binocular cross cylinder, BCC) was examined.ResultsOf the 3268 individuals enrolled, the mean age was 27.3 ± 6.9 years, and 34.8% of participants were male. The noncycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) was 0.23 ± 0.29 D and 0.64 ± 0.61 D more myopic than cycloplegic subjective and automatic refraction. Adjusting for associated factors, participants with at least 0.50 D of more myopia SE refraction by noncycloplegic subjective refraction were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR], 1.029; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.013–1.045) and with insufficient (OR, 1.514; 95% CI, 1.093–2.096) and excessive (OR, 2.196; 95% CI, 1.538–3.137) NRA value. The automatic refraction SE difference of at least 1.00 D more myopia was more likely to be found in individuals with older age (OR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.022–1.050) and accommodative lead (OR, 1.255; 95% CI, 1.004–1.568).ConclusionA quarter of adult myopes had at least 0.50 and 1.00 D of subjective and automatic SE difference with cycloplegia. The accommodation function significantly affects the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction. Investigating the differences in refraction measurement guarantees the proper use of cycloplegia in adults for myopia correction. 10.1111/aos.16632 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aos.16632
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_aos_16632
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle The impact of accommodation function on the difference between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in adult myopes
Wang Yuexin
Zhang Yu
Yuan Yifei
Liu Yan
Chen Yueguo
Acta Ophthalmologica
The impact of accommodation function on the difference between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in adult myopes Wang Yuexin Zhang Yu Yuan Yifei Liu Yan Chen Yueguo Acta Ophthalmologica AbstractPurposeTo investigate the impact of accommodation function on the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic subjective and automatic refraction in adult myopes.MethodsMyopic patients between 18 and 50 years old evaluated at Peking University Third Hospital who underwent cycloplegic and noncycloplegic automatic and subjective refraction were enrolled. Accommodation function, including negative and positive relative accommodation (PRA/NRA) and accommodation response (binocular cross cylinder, BCC) was examined.ResultsOf the 3268 individuals enrolled, the mean age was 27.3 ± 6.9 years, and 34.8% of participants were male. The noncycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) was 0.23 ± 0.29 D and 0.64 ± 0.61 D more myopic than cycloplegic subjective and automatic refraction. Adjusting for associated factors, participants with at least 0.50 D of more myopia SE refraction by noncycloplegic subjective refraction were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR], 1.029; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.013–1.045) and with insufficient (OR, 1.514; 95% CI, 1.093–2.096) and excessive (OR, 2.196; 95% CI, 1.538–3.137) NRA value. The automatic refraction SE difference of at least 1.00 D more myopia was more likely to be found in individuals with older age (OR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.022–1.050) and accommodative lead (OR, 1.255; 95% CI, 1.004–1.568).ConclusionA quarter of adult myopes had at least 0.50 and 1.00 D of subjective and automatic SE difference with cycloplegia. The accommodation function significantly affects the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction. Investigating the differences in refraction measurement guarantees the proper use of cycloplegia in adults for myopia correction. 10.1111/aos.16632 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title The impact of accommodation function on the difference between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in adult myopes
topic Acta Ophthalmologica
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.16632