Considering the Developing Entity in an Artificial Womb as a Patient

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frédérique Drouin, Alice Cavolo, Vardit Ravitsky, Charles Dupras
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867003874735292416
author Frédérique Drouin
Alice Cavolo
Vardit Ravitsky
Charles Dupras
author_facet Frédérique Drouin
Alice Cavolo
Vardit Ravitsky
Charles Dupras
Frédérique Drouin
Alice Cavolo
Vardit Ravitsky
Charles Dupras
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Considering the Developing Entity in an Artificial Womb as a Patient Frédérique Drouin Alice Cavolo Vardit Ravitsky Charles Dupras Bioethics ABSTRACTArtificial womb (AW) prototypes are currently being developed with the aim of improving the medical care of extremely premature infants. Despite the seemingly imminent reality of partial ectogenesis (i.e., gestation partially outside a human womb), there is persisting debate about the moral status of the fetus transferred in an AW—henceforth, the “developing entity.” For some, AWs are simply another neonatal intensive cares’ technology. Thus, developing entities in AWs should deserve the same protections as newborns in incubators. Others consider that AWs are fundamentally different technologies than incubators. Therefore, they believe that developing entities in AWs are new moral entities. These differences in perception generate disagreement about how developing entities in AWs should be treated and how decisions about them should be made. We argue that developing entities in AWs should be considered patients by transposing Chervenak and McCullough's “The fetus as a patient” proposition to the context of partial ectogenesis. As pregnant persons will have to consent to transfer their fetuses in AWs, and this technology will ultimately present itself as a beneficial medical intervention for viable developing entities in AWs, these latter would be patients, even if they are not legally and morally recognized as person. Thus, the moral obligations of beneficence and non‐maleficence owed by physicians to their patients would apply to entities in AWs, ethically guiding their treatment and decision‐making toward them. 10.1111/bioe.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bioe.70021
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_bioe_70021
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Considering the Developing Entity in an Artificial Womb as a Patient
Frédérique Drouin
Alice Cavolo
Vardit Ravitsky
Charles Dupras
Bioethics
Considering the Developing Entity in an Artificial Womb as a Patient Frédérique Drouin Alice Cavolo Vardit Ravitsky Charles Dupras Bioethics ABSTRACTArtificial womb (AW) prototypes are currently being developed with the aim of improving the medical care of extremely premature infants. Despite the seemingly imminent reality of partial ectogenesis (i.e., gestation partially outside a human womb), there is persisting debate about the moral status of the fetus transferred in an AW—henceforth, the “developing entity.” For some, AWs are simply another neonatal intensive cares’ technology. Thus, developing entities in AWs should deserve the same protections as newborns in incubators. Others consider that AWs are fundamentally different technologies than incubators. Therefore, they believe that developing entities in AWs are new moral entities. These differences in perception generate disagreement about how developing entities in AWs should be treated and how decisions about them should be made. We argue that developing entities in AWs should be considered patients by transposing Chervenak and McCullough's “The fetus as a patient” proposition to the context of partial ectogenesis. As pregnant persons will have to consent to transfer their fetuses in AWs, and this technology will ultimately present itself as a beneficial medical intervention for viable developing entities in AWs, these latter would be patients, even if they are not legally and morally recognized as person. Thus, the moral obligations of beneficence and non‐maleficence owed by physicians to their patients would apply to entities in AWs, ethically guiding their treatment and decision‐making toward them. 10.1111/bioe.70021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Considering the Developing Entity in an Artificial Womb as a Patient
topic Bioethics
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.70021