The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Danielle McNabb
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867013169224876032
author Danielle McNabb
author_facet Danielle McNabb
Danielle McNabb
collection Wiley Open Access
contents The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada Danielle McNabb Canadian Public Administration Abstract This article presents a descriptive account of how the administration of third‐party interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada has evolved since 1878. Although there has been an explosion of intervener participation over the past decade, the Court remains divided on how best to regulate their participation. To better understand the contemporary intervener landscape, this article provides a novel periodization of the rules and norms governing interventions at the Supreme Court. The article concludes that the governance of intervention is not an apolitical exercise, but rather reflects the ideas, interests, and identities on the Court at a given time. 10.1111/capa.70040 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/capa.70040
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_capa_70040
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada
Danielle McNabb
Canadian Public Administration
The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada Danielle McNabb Canadian Public Administration Abstract This article presents a descriptive account of how the administration of third‐party interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada has evolved since 1878. Although there has been an explosion of intervener participation over the past decade, the Court remains divided on how best to regulate their participation. To better understand the contemporary intervener landscape, this article provides a novel periodization of the rules and norms governing interventions at the Supreme Court. The article concludes that the governance of intervention is not an apolitical exercise, but rather reflects the ideas, interests, and identities on the Court at a given time. 10.1111/capa.70040 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title The History and Administration of Third‐Party Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada
topic Canadian Public Administration
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.70040