Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Wennervaldt, Helen Vaher, Malin G. Ahlström, Nuno Bischofberger, Torkil Menné, Jacob P. Thyssen, Jeanne D. Johansen, Charlotte M. Bonefeld
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14549
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867020244392869888
author Michael Wennervaldt
Helen Vaher
Malin G. Ahlström
Nuno Bischofberger
Torkil Menné
Jacob P. Thyssen
Jeanne D. Johansen
Charlotte M. Bonefeld
author_facet Michael Wennervaldt
Helen Vaher
Malin G. Ahlström
Nuno Bischofberger
Torkil Menné
Jacob P. Thyssen
Jeanne D. Johansen
Charlotte M. Bonefeld
Michael Wennervaldt
Helen Vaher
Malin G. Ahlström
Nuno Bischofberger
Torkil Menné
Jacob P. Thyssen
Jeanne D. Johansen
Charlotte M. Bonefeld
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Subclinical immune responses to nickel in sensitized individuals—a dose–response study Michael Wennervaldt Helen Vaher Malin G. Ahlström Nuno Bischofberger Torkil Menné Jacob P. Thyssen Jeanne D. Johansen Charlotte M. Bonefeld Contact Dermatitis AbstractBackgroundNickel is the leading cause of contact allergy in Europe, with 14.5% of the adult population being sensitized. Despite regulations limiting nickel release from consumer items, the incidence and prevalence of nickel allergy remain high.ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical and subclinical immune response to low‐dose nickel exposure on nickel pre‐exposed skin to assess the adequacy of current regulatory limits.MethodNickel‐allergic and healthy controls were patch tested with nickel twice with a 3–4 weeks interval. The first exposure used the diagnostic concentration of 2000 μg/cm2 nickel sulphate, and the same skin areas were then re‐exposed to 0.2, 0.5, 12.8 and 370 μg/cm2 nickel sulphate. After 48 h, the patch reactions were examined for clinical signs of eczema, and skin biopsies were collected. The transcriptomic immune profile was analysed with Nanostring nCounter and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.ResultsTwo nickel‐allergic participants (15%) had clinical reactions to the regulatory limiting doses for nickel (0.2/0.5 μg/cm2) following re‐exposure. There was immune activation in all skin areas following re‐exposure to nickel, predominantly mediated by up‐regulation of cytokines and chemokines. In all nickel re‐exposed skin areas, 81 genes were up‐regulated independent from the clinical response. In skin areas exposed to 0.2 μg/cm2, 101 immune‐related genes were differentially expressed, even when no clinical response was observed. Healthy controls showed up‐regulation of three genes in response to nickel re‐exposures without any clinical reactions.ConclusionImmune activation can be induced in skin with local memory to nickel upon challenge with nickel doses within the regulatory limits. Our findings suggest that the regulatory limits in the European nickel regulation may not provide sufficient protection for consumers against low‐dose exposures. 10.1111/cod.14549 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.14549
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_cod_14549
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Subclinical immune responses to nickel in sensitized individuals—a dose–response study
Michael Wennervaldt
Helen Vaher
Malin G. Ahlström
Nuno Bischofberger
Torkil Menné
Jacob P. Thyssen
Jeanne D. Johansen
Charlotte M. Bonefeld
Contact Dermatitis
Subclinical immune responses to nickel in sensitized individuals—a dose–response study Michael Wennervaldt Helen Vaher Malin G. Ahlström Nuno Bischofberger Torkil Menné Jacob P. Thyssen Jeanne D. Johansen Charlotte M. Bonefeld Contact Dermatitis AbstractBackgroundNickel is the leading cause of contact allergy in Europe, with 14.5% of the adult population being sensitized. Despite regulations limiting nickel release from consumer items, the incidence and prevalence of nickel allergy remain high.ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical and subclinical immune response to low‐dose nickel exposure on nickel pre‐exposed skin to assess the adequacy of current regulatory limits.MethodNickel‐allergic and healthy controls were patch tested with nickel twice with a 3–4 weeks interval. The first exposure used the diagnostic concentration of 2000 μg/cm2 nickel sulphate, and the same skin areas were then re‐exposed to 0.2, 0.5, 12.8 and 370 μg/cm2 nickel sulphate. After 48 h, the patch reactions were examined for clinical signs of eczema, and skin biopsies were collected. The transcriptomic immune profile was analysed with Nanostring nCounter and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.ResultsTwo nickel‐allergic participants (15%) had clinical reactions to the regulatory limiting doses for nickel (0.2/0.5 μg/cm2) following re‐exposure. There was immune activation in all skin areas following re‐exposure to nickel, predominantly mediated by up‐regulation of cytokines and chemokines. In all nickel re‐exposed skin areas, 81 genes were up‐regulated independent from the clinical response. In skin areas exposed to 0.2 μg/cm2, 101 immune‐related genes were differentially expressed, even when no clinical response was observed. Healthy controls showed up‐regulation of three genes in response to nickel re‐exposures without any clinical reactions.ConclusionImmune activation can be induced in skin with local memory to nickel upon challenge with nickel doses within the regulatory limits. Our findings suggest that the regulatory limits in the European nickel regulation may not provide sufficient protection for consumers against low‐dose exposures. 10.1111/cod.14549 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Subclinical immune responses to nickel in sensitized individuals—a dose–response study
topic Contact Dermatitis
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14549