Cover Image

Surprising results of patch testing with the baseline series in patients with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen

Fuente: Wiley Open Access

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	V. Marmgren, M. Mowitz, E. Zimerson, M. Hindsén, M. Bruze
Format:	Artículo Open Access
Published:	Wiley 2024
Subjects:	Contact Dermatitis
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Allergic contact dermatitis to petrolatum: An unknown for patch testing
by: M. Napolitano, et al.
Published: (2024)

The significance of dose for the patch test reaction
by: Magnus Bruze, et al.
Published: (2024)

Acute photoallergic contact dermatitis from diclofenac mimicking bullous pemphigoid
by: Annarita Antelmi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023
by: David Pesqué, et al.
Published: (2024)

Cyanoacrylate contact allergy: Tape stripping modification of conventional patch testing
by: Ruchika Kumari, et al.
Published: (2024)

Patch Testing in Individuals With Diabetes Using Medical Devices. Part 2—Contact Allergy to Medical Device Allergens and New Patch Test Recommendations
by: Josefin Ulriksdotter, et al.
Published: (2026)

Patch Testing in Individuals With Diabetes Using Medical Devices. Part 1—Contact Allergy to Baseline Series Allergens
by: Thanisorn Sukakul, et al.
Published: (2026)

Results of patch testing propolis in the European baseline series: A 4‐year retrospective study
by: Gizem Kocabas, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy in Swedish professional ice hockey players
by: Tomas B. J. Eriksson, et al.
Published: (2024)

Results of patch testing with five fragrance materials hitherto not tested: A dose‐finding study in the clinical population
by: Thanisorn Sukakul, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy to textile dye mix in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients: An observational study with historical data from 2015 to 2023
by: Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, et al.
Published: (2024)

A re‐assessment of the value of markers of corticosteroid contact allergy in the Spanish baseline series: Clobetasol propionate in the spotlight
by: Pedro Mercader‐García, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy to N‐isopropyl‐N′‐phenyl paraphenylenediamine in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients: An observational study with historical data from 2013 to 2023
by: Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in ostomy patients
by: Ingrid Siemund, et al.
Published: (2024)

Comparison of patch test positivity after 24 and 48 hours of occlusion time in patients of allergic contact dermatitis: A prospective study
by: Rhea Ahuja, et al.
Published: (2024)

Current frequency of contact allergy to isothiazolinones (methyl‐, benz‐ and octylisothiazolinone) across Europe
by: Jakob F. B. Schwensen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Epidemiology of patch tested patients with permanent tattoos—A comparative analysis of 9693 IVDK patients (2020–2022)
by: Steffen Schubert, et al.
Published: (2024)

Citalopram‐induced DRESS confirmed by patch testing
by: Alpa Kanji, et al.
Published: (2024)

Hand eczema in Italian patients referred for patch testing: A retrospective SIDAPA study (2016–2023)
by: Luca Stingeni, et al.
Published: (2024)

New device, ‘old’ allergens. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the Dexcom G7 glucose sensor
by: Martin Mowitz, et al.
Published: (2024)

Nine years of patch testing with isocyanates in a clinic of occupational dermatology
by: Kristiina Aalto‐Korte, et al.
Published: (2024)

Associations between tobacco smoking status and patch test results—A cross‐sectional pilot study from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
by: Sonja Molin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Clinical relevance of doubtful reactions in patch testing: A single‐centre retrospective study
by: Puneet Arora, et al.
Published: (2024)

Sodium metabisulphite: Findings on patch testing over 5‐years from a single centre
by: Ying X. Teo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Singapore: A retrospective study of patch test data from 2012 to 2021
by: Hui Mei Cheng, et al.
Published: (2024)

Photopatch testing: Clinical characteristics, test results, and final diagnoses from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2009–2020
by: Vincent A. DeLeo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Outbreak of contact allergy to dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in a biotechnology laboratory
by: Linas Griguola, et al.
Published: (2024)

Severely compromised supply of patch test allergens in Europe hampers adequate diagnosis of occupational and non‐occupational contact allergy. A European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) task forces ‘Contact Dermatitis’ and ‘Occupational Skin Disease’ position paper
by: Swen Malte John, et al.
Published: (2024)

Less efficient skin penetration of the metal allergen Pd2+ compared to Ni2+ and Co2+ from patch test preparations
by: Konstantin Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)

Comparison of patch testing Brazilian (Green) propolis and Chinese (poplar‐type) propolis: Clinical epidemiological study using data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
by: K. Piontek, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy caused by acrylates in nail cosmetics: A pilot study from Greece
by: Maria Gkousiaki, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy to olanzapine and saxagliptin in a pharmaceutical industrial worker: A case report
by: Azra Huršidić Radulović, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact allergy to topical ophthalmic medications: A retrospective single‐centre study of three decades
by: Sebastian Vigand Svendsen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Delayed presentation of cobalt allergy to a shoulder prosthesis presenting 4 years post‐implantation
by: James Fuller, et al.
Published: (2024)

Contact Allergy to Methacrylate Containing Nail Products: Lack of Impact of EU Legislation. An Audit on Behalf of the European Environmental Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG)
by: S. Mark Wilkinson, et al.
Published: (2024)

Unveiling the hidden culprit: A case report of recurrent SDRIFE caused by a systemic corticosteroid masquerading as antibiotic allergies
by: Valérie Beaulieu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Eyelid Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Nickel From a Surprising Source: An Illustrating Case of Illuminating Eye Care
by: Thanisorn Sukakul, et al.
Published: (2025)

A comparison of parthenium 15% in Indian Standard Series versus acetone extract 2% of parthenium plant in diagnosing contact allergy to parthenium
by: Nikhil Mehta, et al.
Published: (2024)

Patch testing sodium tetrachloropalladate is a better means to detect palladium sensitisation then palladium chloride—Results of a clinical–epidemiological study of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) from 2003 to 2022
by: S. Schubert, et al.
Published: (2024)

Patch testing with titanium oxalate is not easy
by: James Fuller, et al.
Published: (2024)