_version_ 1867019409689673728
author David Pesqué
Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas
Leopoldo Borrego
Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez
Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet
Esther Serra‐Baldrich
Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel
Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador
Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro
Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo
Pedro Mercader‐García
Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño
Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos
Fátima Tous‐Romero
Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna
Gemma Melé‐Ninot
Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella
Inmaculada Ruiz‐González
María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto
José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo
Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente
Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén
Javier Sánchez‐Pérez
José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez
María Elena Gatica‐Ortega
Ricardo González‐Pérez
Ramon Maria Pujol
Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo
Ignacio García‐Doval
Ana María Giménez‐Arnau
author_facet David Pesqué
Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas
Leopoldo Borrego
Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez
Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet
Esther Serra‐Baldrich
Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel
Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador
Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro
Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo
Pedro Mercader‐García
Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño
Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos
Fátima Tous‐Romero
Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna
Gemma Melé‐Ninot
Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella
Inmaculada Ruiz‐González
María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto
José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo
Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente
Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén
Javier Sánchez‐Pérez
José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez
María Elena Gatica‐Ortega
Ricardo González‐Pérez
Ramon Maria Pujol
Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo
Ignacio García‐Doval
Ana María Giménez‐Arnau
David Pesqué
Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas
Leopoldo Borrego
Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez
Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet
Esther Serra‐Baldrich
Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel
Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador
Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro
Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo
Pedro Mercader‐García
Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño
Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos
Fátima Tous‐Romero
Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna
Gemma Melé‐Ninot
Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella
Inmaculada Ruiz‐González
María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto
José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo
Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente
Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén
Javier Sánchez‐Pérez
José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez
María Elena Gatica‐Ortega
Ricardo González‐Pérez
Ramon Maria Pujol
Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo
Ignacio García‐Doval
Ana María Giménez‐Arnau
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023 David Pesqué Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas Leopoldo Borrego Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet Esther Serra‐Baldrich Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo Pedro Mercader‐García Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos Fátima Tous‐Romero Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna Gemma Melé‐Ninot Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella Inmaculada Ruiz‐González María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén Javier Sánchez‐Pérez José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez María Elena Gatica‐Ortega Ricardo González‐Pérez Ramon Maria Pujol Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo Ignacio García‐Doval Ana María Giménez‐Arnau Contact Dermatitis AbstractIntroductionPatch test results may be influenced by age‐related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results.ObjectivesWe aim to evaluate the patch test results reflecting skin sensitisation, their relevance and association with clinical features by age group.MethodsProspective multicentric study of all patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series in participating centres. Age groups were pre‐defined as children (0‐ to 11‐years), adolescents (12‐ to 18‐years), young adults (19‐ to 30‐years), middle‐aged adults (31‐ to 65‐years) and older adults (≥66‐years). Occurrence of sensitisation, relevance and clinical features were compared by age group. Factors associated with skin sensitisation were investigated with multivariate logistic regression.ResultsA total of 13 368 patients were patch‐tested. Differences in positive patch test results and relevance by age were detected with the highest proportion in middle‐aged adults. Age‐related trend differences were found for nickel, potassium dichromate, caines, colophony, Myroxylon pereirae resin, 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate and limonene hydroperoxide. The multivariate logistic analysis (adjusted for sex, atopic dermatitis, body location and occupational dermatitis) showed an association between the age group of 31–65 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.26–1.58) and above 66‐years (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01–1.32) with a higher proportion of positive results, compared with young adults.ConclusionsPositive patch test results vary according to age, with the highest occurrence in middle‐aged adults. Most haptens did not present age‐related differences, reinforcing the use of baseline series regardless of age. 10.1111/cod.14702 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.14702
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_cod_14702
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023
David Pesqué
Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas
Leopoldo Borrego
Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez
Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet
Esther Serra‐Baldrich
Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel
Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador
Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro
Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo
Pedro Mercader‐García
Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño
Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos
Fátima Tous‐Romero
Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna
Gemma Melé‐Ninot
Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella
Inmaculada Ruiz‐González
María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto
José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo
Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente
Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén
Javier Sánchez‐Pérez
José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez
María Elena Gatica‐Ortega
Ricardo González‐Pérez
Ramon Maria Pujol
Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo
Ignacio García‐Doval
Ana María Giménez‐Arnau
Contact Dermatitis
Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023 David Pesqué Nidia Planella‐Fontanillas Leopoldo Borrego Tatiana Sanz‐Sánchez Violeta Zaragoza‐Ninet Esther Serra‐Baldrich Francisco Javier Miquel‐Miquel Juan Francisco Silvestre‐Salvador Susana Córdoba‐Guijarro Araceli Sánchez‐Gilo Pedro Mercader‐García Francisco José Navarro‐Triviño Francisco Javier Ortiz‐de‐Frutos Fátima Tous‐Romero Mercedes Rodríguez‐Serna Gemma Melé‐Ninot Cristina Barrabés‐Torrella Inmaculada Ruiz‐González María Antonia Pastor‐Nieto José Manuel Carrascosa‐Carrillo Enrique Gómez‐de‐la‐Fuente Paloma Sánchez‐Pedreño‐Guillén Javier Sánchez‐Pérez José Juan Pereyra‐Rodríguez María Elena Gatica‐Ortega Ricardo González‐Pérez Ramon Maria Pujol Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo Ignacio García‐Doval Ana María Giménez‐Arnau Contact Dermatitis AbstractIntroductionPatch test results may be influenced by age‐related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results.ObjectivesWe aim to evaluate the patch test results reflecting skin sensitisation, their relevance and association with clinical features by age group.MethodsProspective multicentric study of all patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series in participating centres. Age groups were pre‐defined as children (0‐ to 11‐years), adolescents (12‐ to 18‐years), young adults (19‐ to 30‐years), middle‐aged adults (31‐ to 65‐years) and older adults (≥66‐years). Occurrence of sensitisation, relevance and clinical features were compared by age group. Factors associated with skin sensitisation were investigated with multivariate logistic regression.ResultsA total of 13 368 patients were patch‐tested. Differences in positive patch test results and relevance by age were detected with the highest proportion in middle‐aged adults. Age‐related trend differences were found for nickel, potassium dichromate, caines, colophony, Myroxylon pereirae resin, 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate and limonene hydroperoxide. The multivariate logistic analysis (adjusted for sex, atopic dermatitis, body location and occupational dermatitis) showed an association between the age group of 31–65 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.26–1.58) and above 66‐years (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01–1.32) with a higher proportion of positive results, compared with young adults.ConclusionsPositive patch test results vary according to age, with the highest occurrence in middle‐aged adults. Most haptens did not present age‐related differences, reinforcing the use of baseline series regardless of age. 10.1111/cod.14702 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023
topic Contact Dermatitis
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14702