The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kian Karimian, Daniel Isufi, Mikkel Bak Jensen, Rebekka Søgaard, Jeanne Duus Johansen, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867003017735176193
author Kian Karimian
Daniel Isufi
Mikkel Bak Jensen
Rebekka Søgaard
Jeanne Duus Johansen
Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
author_facet Kian Karimian
Daniel Isufi
Mikkel Bak Jensen
Rebekka Søgaard
Jeanne Duus Johansen
Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
Kian Karimian
Daniel Isufi
Mikkel Bak Jensen
Rebekka Søgaard
Jeanne Duus Johansen
Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
collection Wiley Open Access
contents The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Kian Karimian Daniel Isufi Mikkel Bak Jensen Rebekka Søgaard Jeanne Duus Johansen Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen Contact Dermatitis ABSTRACT Formaldehyde and its releasers are common preservatives and potent sensitizers. This meta‐analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy and allergy to its five most common releasers among dermatitis patients. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 30th September 2025. A proportion meta‐analysis was conducted using a random‐effects model. A total of 158 studies involving 1 347 638 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy was 2.88% (95% CI 2.55–3.24) with clinical relevance at 41.57%. The pooled prevalence for releasers was 2.76% for 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol, 1.89% for quaternium‐15, 1.42% for diazolidinyl urea, 1.37% for DMDM hydantoin, and 1.20% for imidazolidinyl urea. Quaternium‐15 showed the highest clinical relevance at 55.67%. Significant sensitization rates were observed in different geographic regions, with the highest prevalence found in North America (6.8%). The prevalence rate was 2.96% among children and 2.61% among adults, with no significant difference. The prevalence rate was 2.65% among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 2.85% among patients without AD, with no significant difference. The profound geographic disparities suggest that regulatory interventions, such as the EU's prohibition of formaldehyde and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics, are highly effective public health measures. 10.1111/cod.70172 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.70172
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_cod_70172
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Kian Karimian
Daniel Isufi
Mikkel Bak Jensen
Rebekka Søgaard
Jeanne Duus Johansen
Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen
Contact Dermatitis
The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Kian Karimian Daniel Isufi Mikkel Bak Jensen Rebekka Søgaard Jeanne Duus Johansen Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen Contact Dermatitis ABSTRACT Formaldehyde and its releasers are common preservatives and potent sensitizers. This meta‐analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy and allergy to its five most common releasers among dermatitis patients. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 30th September 2025. A proportion meta‐analysis was conducted using a random‐effects model. A total of 158 studies involving 1 347 638 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of formaldehyde contact allergy was 2.88% (95% CI 2.55–3.24) with clinical relevance at 41.57%. The pooled prevalence for releasers was 2.76% for 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol, 1.89% for quaternium‐15, 1.42% for diazolidinyl urea, 1.37% for DMDM hydantoin, and 1.20% for imidazolidinyl urea. Quaternium‐15 showed the highest clinical relevance at 55.67%. Significant sensitization rates were observed in different geographic regions, with the highest prevalence found in North America (6.8%). The prevalence rate was 2.96% among children and 2.61% among adults, with no significant difference. The prevalence rate was 2.65% among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 2.85% among patients without AD, with no significant difference. The profound geographic disparities suggest that regulatory interventions, such as the EU's prohibition of formaldehyde and quaternium‐15 in cosmetics, are highly effective public health measures. 10.1111/cod.70172 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title The Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
topic Contact Dermatitis
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.70172