Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carly N. Bisset, Susan J. Moug, Raymond Oliphant, Nicola Dames, Simon Parson, Jennifer Cleland
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867008482488614913
author Carly N. Bisset
Susan J. Moug
Raymond Oliphant
Nicola Dames
Simon Parson
Jennifer Cleland
author_facet Carly N. Bisset
Susan J. Moug
Raymond Oliphant
Nicola Dames
Simon Parson
Jennifer Cleland
Carly N. Bisset
Susan J. Moug
Raymond Oliphant
Nicola Dames
Simon Parson
Jennifer Cleland
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications Carly N. Bisset Susan J. Moug Raymond Oliphant Nicola Dames Simon Parson Jennifer Cleland Colorectal Disease AbstractAimWhen making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision‐making and experience of complications.MethodThis qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK‐based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework.ResultsSeventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision‐making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision‐making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision‐making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified.ConclusionColorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal ‘failures’, which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify ‘personalized’ methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes. 10.1111/codi.16943 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.16943
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_16943
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications
Carly N. Bisset
Susan J. Moug
Raymond Oliphant
Nicola Dames
Simon Parson
Jennifer Cleland
Colorectal Disease
Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications Carly N. Bisset Susan J. Moug Raymond Oliphant Nicola Dames Simon Parson Jennifer Cleland Colorectal Disease AbstractAimWhen making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision‐making and experience of complications.MethodThis qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK‐based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework.ResultsSeventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision‐making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision‐making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision‐making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified.ConclusionColorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal ‘failures’, which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify ‘personalized’ methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes. 10.1111/codi.16943 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.16943