Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Ian Whiteley, Susan Randall, Judith Fetheny, Fiona Stanaway
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.16985
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867015552028901376
author Ian Whiteley
Susan Randall
Judith Fetheny
Fiona Stanaway
author_facet Ian Whiteley
Susan Randall
Judith Fetheny
Fiona Stanaway
Ian Whiteley
Susan Randall
Judith Fetheny
Fiona Stanaway
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Comparison of adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using the OAI‐23 Ian Whiteley Susan Randall Judith Fetheny Fiona Stanaway Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe aim of this work was to compare adjustment between those with a new temporary or permanent ostomy in a cohort of Australian adults.MethodThis is a multicentre, longitudinal observational study. Ostomy adjustment was measured using the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory (OAI‐23) at six possible time points ending at 9 months postsurgery or at the time of ostomy closure in those with a temporary stoma. The OAI‐23 includes four domains: anger, acceptance, anxious preoccupation and social engagement.ResultsEligibility criteria were met by 1230 patients, with 849 (69%) recruited and consented. Of these, 108 were excluded as their surgery did not result in the formation of an ostomy and a further 41 were excluded due to there being no data on ostomy type (temporary or permanent). This left a study population of 700, of whom 397 had a temporary and 303 a permanent ostomy. Only small differences were observed between the temporary and permanent ostomy groups at most time points within the four OAI‐23 domains. There were no statistically significant differences found beyond 2 weeks postdischarge and the differences were of small size. While no difference was found between the groups in the domain of anxious preoccupation, both groups demonstrated an increase in anxious preoccupation over time. Neither group regained their presurgery confidence to attend social engagements.ConclusionWe found only minor differences in adjustment in those with a new temporary ostomy compared with a new permanent ostomy. Both groups demonstrated increasing anxious preoccupation and problems with social engagement. This suggests that access to education, training and support should be equitable between these two groups in clinical practice, and needs to incorporate a focus on psychological as well as physical outcomes. 10.1111/codi.16985 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.16985
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_16985
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Comparison of adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using the OAI‐23
Ian Whiteley
Susan Randall
Judith Fetheny
Fiona Stanaway
Colorectal Disease
Comparison of adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using the OAI‐23 Ian Whiteley Susan Randall Judith Fetheny Fiona Stanaway Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe aim of this work was to compare adjustment between those with a new temporary or permanent ostomy in a cohort of Australian adults.MethodThis is a multicentre, longitudinal observational study. Ostomy adjustment was measured using the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory (OAI‐23) at six possible time points ending at 9 months postsurgery or at the time of ostomy closure in those with a temporary stoma. The OAI‐23 includes four domains: anger, acceptance, anxious preoccupation and social engagement.ResultsEligibility criteria were met by 1230 patients, with 849 (69%) recruited and consented. Of these, 108 were excluded as their surgery did not result in the formation of an ostomy and a further 41 were excluded due to there being no data on ostomy type (temporary or permanent). This left a study population of 700, of whom 397 had a temporary and 303 a permanent ostomy. Only small differences were observed between the temporary and permanent ostomy groups at most time points within the four OAI‐23 domains. There were no statistically significant differences found beyond 2 weeks postdischarge and the differences were of small size. While no difference was found between the groups in the domain of anxious preoccupation, both groups demonstrated an increase in anxious preoccupation over time. Neither group regained their presurgery confidence to attend social engagements.ConclusionWe found only minor differences in adjustment in those with a new temporary ostomy compared with a new permanent ostomy. Both groups demonstrated increasing anxious preoccupation and problems with social engagement. This suggests that access to education, training and support should be equitable between these two groups in clinical practice, and needs to incorporate a focus on psychological as well as physical outcomes. 10.1111/codi.16985 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Comparison of adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using the OAI‐23
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.16985