Long‐term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross‐sectional study

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen, Eline G. M. van Geffen, Tania C. Sluckin, Geerard L. Beets, Henricus J. Belgers, Wernard A. A. Borstlap, Esther C. J. Consten, Jan‐Willem T. Dekker, Roel Hompes, Jurriaan B. Tuynman, Henderik L. van Westreenen, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Pieter J. Tanis, Miranda Kusters
Format: Artículo Open Access
Publié: Wiley 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867002266861436928
author Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen
Eline G. M. van Geffen
Tania C. Sluckin
Geerard L. Beets
Henricus J. Belgers
Wernard A. A. Borstlap
Esther C. J. Consten
Jan‐Willem T. Dekker
Roel Hompes
Jurriaan B. Tuynman
Henderik L. van Westreenen
Johannes H. W. de Wilt
Pieter J. Tanis
Miranda Kusters
author_facet Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen
Eline G. M. van Geffen
Tania C. Sluckin
Geerard L. Beets
Henricus J. Belgers
Wernard A. A. Borstlap
Esther C. J. Consten
Jan‐Willem T. Dekker
Roel Hompes
Jurriaan B. Tuynman
Henderik L. van Westreenen
Johannes H. W. de Wilt
Pieter J. Tanis
Miranda Kusters
Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen
Eline G. M. van Geffen
Tania C. Sluckin
Geerard L. Beets
Henricus J. Belgers
Wernard A. A. Borstlap
Esther C. J. Consten
Jan‐Willem T. Dekker
Roel Hompes
Jurriaan B. Tuynman
Henderik L. van Westreenen
Johannes H. W. de Wilt
Pieter J. Tanis
Miranda Kusters
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Long‐term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross‐sectional study Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen Eline G. M. van Geffen Tania C. Sluckin Geerard L. Beets Henricus J. Belgers Wernard A. A. Borstlap Esther C. J. Consten Jan‐Willem T. Dekker Roel Hompes Jurriaan B. Tuynman Henderik L. van Westreenen Johannes H. W. de Wilt Pieter J. Tanis Miranda Kusters Colorectal Disease AbstractAimLiterature on nationwide long‐term permanent stoma rates after rectal cancer resection in the minimally invasive era is scarce. The aim of this population‐based study was to provide more insight into the permanent stoma rate with interhospital variability (IHV) depending on surgical technique, with pelvic sepsis, unplanned reinterventions and readmissions as secondary outcomes.MethodPatients who underwent open or minimally invasive resection of rectal cancer (lower border below the sigmoid take‐off) in 67 Dutch centres in 2016 were included in this cross‐sectional cohort study.ResultsAmong 2530 patients, 1470 underwent a restorative resection (58%), 356 a Hartmann's procedure (14%, IHV 0%–42%) and 704 an abdominoperineal resection (28%, IHV 3%–60%). Median follow‐up was 51 months. The overall permanent stoma rate at last follow‐up was 50% (IHV 13%–79%) and the unintentional permanent stoma rate, permanent stoma after a restorative procedure or an unplanned Hartmann's procedure, was 11% (IHV 0%–29%). A total of 2165 patients (86%) underwent a minimally invasive resection: 1760 conventional (81%), 170 transanal (8%) and 235 robot‐assisted (11%). An anastomosis was created in 59%, 80% and 66%, with corresponding unintentional permanent stoma rates of 12%, 24% and 14% (p = 0.001), respectively. When corrected for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, cTNM, distance to the anorectal junction and neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, the minimally invasive technique was not associated with an unintended permanent stoma (p = 0.071) after a restorative procedure.ConclusionA remarkable IHV in the permanent stoma rate after rectal cancer resection was found. No beneficial influence of transanal or robot‐assisted laparoscopy on the unintentional permanent stoma rate was found, although this might be caused by the surgical learning curve. A reduction in IHV and improving preoperative counselling for decision‐making for restorative procedures are required. 10.1111/codi.17015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.17015
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_17015
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Long‐term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross‐sectional study
Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen
Eline G. M. van Geffen
Tania C. Sluckin
Geerard L. Beets
Henricus J. Belgers
Wernard A. A. Borstlap
Esther C. J. Consten
Jan‐Willem T. Dekker
Roel Hompes
Jurriaan B. Tuynman
Henderik L. van Westreenen
Johannes H. W. de Wilt
Pieter J. Tanis
Miranda Kusters
Colorectal Disease
Long‐term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross‐sectional study Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen Eline G. M. van Geffen Tania C. Sluckin Geerard L. Beets Henricus J. Belgers Wernard A. A. Borstlap Esther C. J. Consten Jan‐Willem T. Dekker Roel Hompes Jurriaan B. Tuynman Henderik L. van Westreenen Johannes H. W. de Wilt Pieter J. Tanis Miranda Kusters Colorectal Disease AbstractAimLiterature on nationwide long‐term permanent stoma rates after rectal cancer resection in the minimally invasive era is scarce. The aim of this population‐based study was to provide more insight into the permanent stoma rate with interhospital variability (IHV) depending on surgical technique, with pelvic sepsis, unplanned reinterventions and readmissions as secondary outcomes.MethodPatients who underwent open or minimally invasive resection of rectal cancer (lower border below the sigmoid take‐off) in 67 Dutch centres in 2016 were included in this cross‐sectional cohort study.ResultsAmong 2530 patients, 1470 underwent a restorative resection (58%), 356 a Hartmann's procedure (14%, IHV 0%–42%) and 704 an abdominoperineal resection (28%, IHV 3%–60%). Median follow‐up was 51 months. The overall permanent stoma rate at last follow‐up was 50% (IHV 13%–79%) and the unintentional permanent stoma rate, permanent stoma after a restorative procedure or an unplanned Hartmann's procedure, was 11% (IHV 0%–29%). A total of 2165 patients (86%) underwent a minimally invasive resection: 1760 conventional (81%), 170 transanal (8%) and 235 robot‐assisted (11%). An anastomosis was created in 59%, 80% and 66%, with corresponding unintentional permanent stoma rates of 12%, 24% and 14% (p = 0.001), respectively. When corrected for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, cTNM, distance to the anorectal junction and neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, the minimally invasive technique was not associated with an unintended permanent stoma (p = 0.071) after a restorative procedure.ConclusionA remarkable IHV in the permanent stoma rate after rectal cancer resection was found. No beneficial influence of transanal or robot‐assisted laparoscopy on the unintentional permanent stoma rate was found, although this might be caused by the surgical learning curve. A reduction in IHV and improving preoperative counselling for decision‐making for restorative procedures are required. 10.1111/codi.17015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Long‐term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross‐sectional study
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.17015