Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a population‐based study

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Elin Mariusdottir, Fredrik Jörgren, Marie‐Louise Lydrup, Pamela Buchwald
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867021371237728256
author Elin Mariusdottir
Fredrik Jörgren
Marie‐Louise Lydrup
Pamela Buchwald
author_facet Elin Mariusdottir
Fredrik Jörgren
Marie‐Louise Lydrup
Pamela Buchwald
Elin Mariusdottir
Fredrik Jörgren
Marie‐Louise Lydrup
Pamela Buchwald
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a population‐based study Elin Mariusdottir Fredrik Jörgren Marie‐Louise Lydrup Pamela Buchwald Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThere is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which Hartmann's procedure (HP) should be used in rectal cancer treatment. This study was designed to investigate 30‐day postoperative morbidity and mortality following HP, anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer using a national registry.MethodsAll patients operated for rectal cancer, tumour height 5–15 cm, between the years 2010 and 2017, were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry.ResultsA total of 8476 patients were included: 1210 (14%) undergoing HP, 5406 (64%) AR and 1860 (22%) APR. HP was associated with an increased risk of intra‐abdominal infection (OR 1.7, CI 1.26–2.28, P = 0.0004) compared to AR and APR, while APR was related to an increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.01–1.40, P = 0.040). No significant difference was observed in the rate of reoperations and readmissions between HP, AR and APR, and type of surgical procedure was not a risk factor for 30‐day mortality. Findings from a subgroup analysis of patients with a tumour 5–7 cm from the anal verge revealed that HP was not associated with increased risk for complications or 30‐day mortality.ConclusionsFor patients where AR is not appropriate HP is a valid alternative with a favourable outcome. APR was associated with the highest overall 30‐day complication rate. 10.1111/codi.17033 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.17033
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_17033
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a population‐based study
Elin Mariusdottir
Fredrik Jörgren
Marie‐Louise Lydrup
Pamela Buchwald
Colorectal Disease
Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a population‐based study Elin Mariusdottir Fredrik Jörgren Marie‐Louise Lydrup Pamela Buchwald Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThere is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which Hartmann's procedure (HP) should be used in rectal cancer treatment. This study was designed to investigate 30‐day postoperative morbidity and mortality following HP, anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer using a national registry.MethodsAll patients operated for rectal cancer, tumour height 5–15 cm, between the years 2010 and 2017, were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry.ResultsA total of 8476 patients were included: 1210 (14%) undergoing HP, 5406 (64%) AR and 1860 (22%) APR. HP was associated with an increased risk of intra‐abdominal infection (OR 1.7, CI 1.26–2.28, P = 0.0004) compared to AR and APR, while APR was related to an increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.01–1.40, P = 0.040). No significant difference was observed in the rate of reoperations and readmissions between HP, AR and APR, and type of surgical procedure was not a risk factor for 30‐day mortality. Findings from a subgroup analysis of patients with a tumour 5–7 cm from the anal verge revealed that HP was not associated with increased risk for complications or 30‐day mortality.ConclusionsFor patients where AR is not appropriate HP is a valid alternative with a favourable outcome. APR was associated with the highest overall 30‐day complication rate. 10.1111/codi.17033 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer—a population‐based study
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.17033