Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Evy E. J. Jetten, Ruud F. W. Franssen, Melissa J. J. Voorn, Roberto Falz, Martin Busse, Bart C. Bongers, Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen, Thomas J. Hoogeboom
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867010123764858880
author Evy E. J. Jetten
Ruud F. W. Franssen
Melissa J. J. Voorn
Roberto Falz
Martin Busse
Bart C. Bongers
Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen
Thomas J. Hoogeboom
author_facet Evy E. J. Jetten
Ruud F. W. Franssen
Melissa J. J. Voorn
Roberto Falz
Martin Busse
Bart C. Bongers
Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen
Thomas J. Hoogeboom
Evy E. J. Jetten
Ruud F. W. Franssen
Melissa J. J. Voorn
Roberto Falz
Martin Busse
Bart C. Bongers
Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen
Thomas J. Hoogeboom
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Evy E. J. Jetten Ruud F. W. Franssen Melissa J. J. Voorn Roberto Falz Martin Busse Bart C. Bongers Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen Thomas J. Hoogeboom Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe aim of this work was to evaluate whether the therapeutic quality of exercise prehabilitation programmes is associated with their effectiveness to preoperatively improve aerobic fitness and reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery.MethodThree electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) were systematically searched (up to October 2023) for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of prehabilitation before colorectal resection. Methodological quality and therapeutic quality were assessed using, respectively, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the i‐CONTENT tool. Studies were divided into four subgroups based on the estimated risk of bias and risk of ineffectiveness.ResultsFourteen studies were included, comprising 986 patients. Meta‐analysis showed that, in general, prehabilitation improved preoperative aerobic fitness but did not improve postoperative outcomes. No differences were found between the four subgroups; however, only one study (7%) had a low risk of bias in combination with a low risk of ineffectiveness.ConclusionThe fact that only one study had a low risk of bias in combination with a low risk of ineffectiveness precluded us from establishing an association between therapeutic quality and the effectiveness of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes. The quality of future prehabilitation research with exercise interventions should be improved by using an assessment tool during the design phase of prehabilitation programmes. 10.1111/codi.70023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.70023
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_70023
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Evy E. J. Jetten
Ruud F. W. Franssen
Melissa J. J. Voorn
Roberto Falz
Martin Busse
Bart C. Bongers
Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen
Thomas J. Hoogeboom
Colorectal Disease
Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Evy E. J. Jetten Ruud F. W. Franssen Melissa J. J. Voorn Roberto Falz Martin Busse Bart C. Bongers Maryska L. G. Janssen‐Heijnen Thomas J. Hoogeboom Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe aim of this work was to evaluate whether the therapeutic quality of exercise prehabilitation programmes is associated with their effectiveness to preoperatively improve aerobic fitness and reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery.MethodThree electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) were systematically searched (up to October 2023) for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of prehabilitation before colorectal resection. Methodological quality and therapeutic quality were assessed using, respectively, the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the i‐CONTENT tool. Studies were divided into four subgroups based on the estimated risk of bias and risk of ineffectiveness.ResultsFourteen studies were included, comprising 986 patients. Meta‐analysis showed that, in general, prehabilitation improved preoperative aerobic fitness but did not improve postoperative outcomes. No differences were found between the four subgroups; however, only one study (7%) had a low risk of bias in combination with a low risk of ineffectiveness.ConclusionThe fact that only one study had a low risk of bias in combination with a low risk of ineffectiveness precluded us from establishing an association between therapeutic quality and the effectiveness of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes. The quality of future prehabilitation research with exercise interventions should be improved by using an assessment tool during the design phase of prehabilitation programmes. 10.1111/codi.70023 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Evaluating the therapeutic quality of prehabilitation programmes in patients scheduled for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70023