Total neoadjuvant therapy in early‐onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Sergei Bedrikovetski, Ishraq Murshed, Tracy Fitzsimmons, Luke Traeger, Timothy J. Price, Michael Penniment, Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam, Ryash Vather, Tarik Sammour
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867017453001768961
author Sergei Bedrikovetski
Ishraq Murshed
Tracy Fitzsimmons
Luke Traeger
Timothy J. Price
Michael Penniment
Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam
Ryash Vather
Tarik Sammour
author_facet Sergei Bedrikovetski
Ishraq Murshed
Tracy Fitzsimmons
Luke Traeger
Timothy J. Price
Michael Penniment
Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam
Ryash Vather
Tarik Sammour
Sergei Bedrikovetski
Ishraq Murshed
Tracy Fitzsimmons
Luke Traeger
Timothy J. Price
Michael Penniment
Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam
Ryash Vather
Tarik Sammour
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Total neoadjuvant therapy in early‐onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study Sergei Bedrikovetski Ishraq Murshed Tracy Fitzsimmons Luke Traeger Timothy J. Price Michael Penniment Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam Ryash Vather Tarik Sammour Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe incidence of early‐onset (age <50 years) rectal cancer (EORC) is rising globally, often presenting at an advanced stage. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly utilised in the management of advanced rectal cancers due to improved response and survival rates. However, it remains unclear whether EORC in an unscreened population responds similarly to TNT compared to average or late‐onset (age ≥50 years) rectal cancer (AORC).MethodThis study included consecutive patients treated with curative intent with TNT for rectal cancer at three South Australian hospitals between 2019 and 2024. Patients were divided into EORC and AORC cohorts. The primary outcome was overall complete response (oCR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and/or pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary outcomes included compliance and treatment‐related toxicity.ResultsOf 202 eligible patients, 48 (23.8%) were in the EORC cohort and 154 (76.2%) in the AORC cohort. No significant difference in oCR rate was observed between EORC and AORC patients (43.8% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.470). cCR, pCR and complete M1 response rates were also similar between the two groups. EORC patients experienced significantly less Grade 3–4 chemotherapy‐induced toxicity compared to AORC patients (2.1% vs. 25.3%, P < 0.001), but reported higher rates of patient‐reported Grade 3–4 radiotherapy‐induced toxicity than AORC patients (31.3% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.004).ConclusionEORC patients exhibit comparable overall tumour response rates to AORC patients treated with TNT. However, toxicity profiles differ, with EORC patients experiencing less chemotherapy‐induced toxicity but more patient‐reported radiation‐induced toxicity. 10.1111/codi.70059 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.70059
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_70059
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Total neoadjuvant therapy in early‐onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study
Sergei Bedrikovetski
Ishraq Murshed
Tracy Fitzsimmons
Luke Traeger
Timothy J. Price
Michael Penniment
Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam
Ryash Vather
Tarik Sammour
Colorectal Disease
Total neoadjuvant therapy in early‐onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study Sergei Bedrikovetski Ishraq Murshed Tracy Fitzsimmons Luke Traeger Timothy J. Price Michael Penniment Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam Ryash Vather Tarik Sammour Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThe incidence of early‐onset (age <50 years) rectal cancer (EORC) is rising globally, often presenting at an advanced stage. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly utilised in the management of advanced rectal cancers due to improved response and survival rates. However, it remains unclear whether EORC in an unscreened population responds similarly to TNT compared to average or late‐onset (age ≥50 years) rectal cancer (AORC).MethodThis study included consecutive patients treated with curative intent with TNT for rectal cancer at three South Australian hospitals between 2019 and 2024. Patients were divided into EORC and AORC cohorts. The primary outcome was overall complete response (oCR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and/or pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary outcomes included compliance and treatment‐related toxicity.ResultsOf 202 eligible patients, 48 (23.8%) were in the EORC cohort and 154 (76.2%) in the AORC cohort. No significant difference in oCR rate was observed between EORC and AORC patients (43.8% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.470). cCR, pCR and complete M1 response rates were also similar between the two groups. EORC patients experienced significantly less Grade 3–4 chemotherapy‐induced toxicity compared to AORC patients (2.1% vs. 25.3%, P < 0.001), but reported higher rates of patient‐reported Grade 3–4 radiotherapy‐induced toxicity than AORC patients (31.3% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.004).ConclusionEORC patients exhibit comparable overall tumour response rates to AORC patients treated with TNT. However, toxicity profiles differ, with EORC patients experiencing less chemotherapy‐induced toxicity but more patient‐reported radiation‐induced toxicity. 10.1111/codi.70059 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Total neoadjuvant therapy in early‐onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70059