Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Publié: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70086 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1867003994833944576 |
|---|---|
| author | Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford |
| author_facet | Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Does endoscopic management have a role in chronic radiation proctopathy: A systematic review Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford Colorectal Disease Abstract Aim Chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is a significant side‐effect of radiotherapy, and poses a challenge in clinical management, necessitating effective and standardized therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to investigate the role of endoscopic interventions for CRP, focusing on argon plasma coagulation (APC) and formalin application. Method A literature search was undertaken for studies that investigated the clinical responses to endoscopic management in patients with CRP. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and a meta‐analysis of proportions was conducted with a random‐effects model. ROBINS‐I and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to assess risk of bias in cohort studies and randomized control trials, respectively. Results A total of 82 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 11 randomized control trials, 20 systematic reviews, one cohort study and 50 case series. A robust 89% (95% CI 84%–92%, p < 0.01 and 95% CI 84%–93%, p = 0.03) pooled response rate was demonstrated for both APC and formalin therapies, respectively. Adverse effects were generally minimal. Conclusion Endoscopic therapies, particularly APC and formalin, exhibit commendable clinical response rates in the management of CRP. However, the lack of standardized treatment protocols highlights the need for larger prospective studies. Clear guidelines, informed by defined outcomes and quality‐of‐life assessments, are imperative for enhancing patient outcomes and minimizing the morbidity associated with CRP. 10.1111/codi.70086 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/codi.70086 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_70086 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Does endoscopic management have a role in chronic radiation proctopathy: A systematic review Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford Colorectal Disease Does endoscopic management have a role in chronic radiation proctopathy: A systematic review Chyu Lai Yan Naing Jayden Gittens Matthew Fok Hayley Fowler Dale Vimalachandran Rachael E. Clifford Colorectal Disease Abstract Aim Chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is a significant side‐effect of radiotherapy, and poses a challenge in clinical management, necessitating effective and standardized therapeutic approaches. The aim of this review is to investigate the role of endoscopic interventions for CRP, focusing on argon plasma coagulation (APC) and formalin application. Method A literature search was undertaken for studies that investigated the clinical responses to endoscopic management in patients with CRP. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and a meta‐analysis of proportions was conducted with a random‐effects model. ROBINS‐I and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to assess risk of bias in cohort studies and randomized control trials, respectively. Results A total of 82 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 11 randomized control trials, 20 systematic reviews, one cohort study and 50 case series. A robust 89% (95% CI 84%–92%, p < 0.01 and 95% CI 84%–93%, p = 0.03) pooled response rate was demonstrated for both APC and formalin therapies, respectively. Adverse effects were generally minimal. Conclusion Endoscopic therapies, particularly APC and formalin, exhibit commendable clinical response rates in the management of CRP. However, the lack of standardized treatment protocols highlights the need for larger prospective studies. Clear guidelines, informed by defined outcomes and quality‐of‐life assessments, are imperative for enhancing patient outcomes and minimizing the morbidity associated with CRP. 10.1111/codi.70086 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| title | Does endoscopic management have a role in chronic radiation proctopathy: A systematic review |
| topic | Colorectal Disease |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70086 |