Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid, Soran Gadan, Göran Wallin, Caroline Nordenvall, Sol Erika Boman, Ida Hed Myrberg, Peter Matthiessen
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867002705072881664
author Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid
Soran Gadan
Göran Wallin
Caroline Nordenvall
Sol Erika Boman
Ida Hed Myrberg
Peter Matthiessen
author_facet Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid
Soran Gadan
Göran Wallin
Caroline Nordenvall
Sol Erika Boman
Ida Hed Myrberg
Peter Matthiessen
Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid
Soran Gadan
Göran Wallin
Caroline Nordenvall
Sol Erika Boman
Ida Hed Myrberg
Peter Matthiessen
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery? Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid Soran Gadan Göran Wallin Caroline Nordenvall Sol Erika Boman Ida Hed Myrberg Peter Matthiessen Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThis study aimed to estimate the impact of socioeconomic status on the probability of receiving open (OPEN) or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for curative abdominal rectal cancer resection.MethodsAll patients diagnosed with rectal cancer clinical Stage I–III during the period 2010–2021 who underwent curative abdominal resection surgery, MIS or OPEN, were included. Patients were identified in the Colorectal Cancer Database, a register‐linkage based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register and linked to several national Swedish health‐related and demographic registers. Socioeconomic factors, sex, patient and tumour characteristics, number of previous surgical procedures and category of hospital were collected. Exposures were level of education (categorized as 6–9, 10–12, >12 years), household income (quartiles 1–4) and country of birth (Sweden, Nordic countries outside Sweden, Europe outside the Nordic countries, outside Europe), and outcome was MIS or OPEN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for each exposure, adjusted for age, sex, cT and cN, level of tumour, and number of previous abdominal surgical procedures.ResultsA total of 13 778 patients were included of whom 43.6% underwent MIS (n = 6007) and 56.4% OPEN (n = 7771). Highest level of education (OR for highest vs. lowest level of education 1.15; 95% CI 1.03–1.29) and highest household income quartile (OR for highest vs. lowest household income quartile 1.27; 95% CI 1.12–1.44) increased the likelihood of receiving MIS.ConclusionDespite the tax‐financed healthcare system in Sweden, rectal cancer patients with the highest level of education and the highest household income had an increased probability of receiving MIS. 10.1111/codi.70111 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.70111
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_70111
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?
Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid
Soran Gadan
Göran Wallin
Caroline Nordenvall
Sol Erika Boman
Ida Hed Myrberg
Peter Matthiessen
Colorectal Disease
Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery? Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid Soran Gadan Göran Wallin Caroline Nordenvall Sol Erika Boman Ida Hed Myrberg Peter Matthiessen Colorectal Disease AbstractAimThis study aimed to estimate the impact of socioeconomic status on the probability of receiving open (OPEN) or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for curative abdominal rectal cancer resection.MethodsAll patients diagnosed with rectal cancer clinical Stage I–III during the period 2010–2021 who underwent curative abdominal resection surgery, MIS or OPEN, were included. Patients were identified in the Colorectal Cancer Database, a register‐linkage based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register and linked to several national Swedish health‐related and demographic registers. Socioeconomic factors, sex, patient and tumour characteristics, number of previous surgical procedures and category of hospital were collected. Exposures were level of education (categorized as 6–9, 10–12, >12 years), household income (quartiles 1–4) and country of birth (Sweden, Nordic countries outside Sweden, Europe outside the Nordic countries, outside Europe), and outcome was MIS or OPEN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for each exposure, adjusted for age, sex, cT and cN, level of tumour, and number of previous abdominal surgical procedures.ResultsA total of 13 778 patients were included of whom 43.6% underwent MIS (n = 6007) and 56.4% OPEN (n = 7771). Highest level of education (OR for highest vs. lowest level of education 1.15; 95% CI 1.03–1.29) and highest household income quartile (OR for highest vs. lowest household income quartile 1.27; 95% CI 1.12–1.44) increased the likelihood of receiving MIS.ConclusionDespite the tax‐financed healthcare system in Sweden, rectal cancer patients with the highest level of education and the highest household income had an increased probability of receiving MIS. 10.1111/codi.70111 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Does socioeconomic status influence the choice of surgical technique in abdominal rectal cancer surgery?
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70111