Endometriosis and its role in pouch patients: A matched‐pair analysis

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jessica Stockheim, Mikhael Belkovsky, Lukas Schabl, Stefan D. Holubar, Scott R. Steele, Tracy Hull, Hermann Kessler
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867007941041717248
author Jessica Stockheim
Mikhael Belkovsky
Lukas Schabl
Stefan D. Holubar
Scott R. Steele
Tracy Hull
Hermann Kessler
author_facet Jessica Stockheim
Mikhael Belkovsky
Lukas Schabl
Stefan D. Holubar
Scott R. Steele
Tracy Hull
Hermann Kessler
Jessica Stockheim
Mikhael Belkovsky
Lukas Schabl
Stefan D. Holubar
Scott R. Steele
Tracy Hull
Hermann Kessler
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Endometriosis and its role in pouch patients: A matched‐pair analysis Jessica Stockheim Mikhael Belkovsky Lukas Schabl Stefan D. Holubar Scott R. Steele Tracy Hull Hermann Kessler Colorectal Disease Abstract Introduction Patients requiring ileoanal pouch (IPAA) are often women of reproductive age. Outcomes in pouch patients with endometriosis have not been described. This study aimed to assess the association of endometriosis on pelvic pouch function, quality of life and pouch survival. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent IPAA between 1985 and 2022 with endometriosis were retrospectively reviewed and matched in a 1:3 ratio based on gender, diagnosis, pouch type, age at pouch creation, BMI and ASA score. Results Twenty‐two patients with endometriosis and IPAA were matched with 66 patients without endometriosis, with ulcerative colitis being the most common diagnosis in both groups (86%). Histopathological verification of endometriosis was available in 45.5% of cases. Intraoperative variables and surgery‐related postoperative complications were similar between groups, except for a higher incidence of thromboembolism in the endometriosis group (18% vs. 3%, p  = 0.04). There was no significant difference in pouchitis (73% vs. 46%, p  = 0.06), while pouch dysfunction occurred significantly more frequently in endometriosis patients (18% vs. 3%, p  = 0.03; OR 7.11, 1.53–33.10, p  = 0.01). Hysterectomy, with or without salpingo‐oophorectomy, was performed in 45% of endometriosis patients, primarily due to endometriosis and pain and most commonly (90%) following IPAA. The timing of endometriosis diagnosis (before or after IPAA) did not significantly influence perioperative outcomes. Overall quality of life was favourable in both groups (0.7 vs. 0.8, p  = 0.35). Conclusion Pouch function was inferior in endometriosis patients, yet with a comparable overall quality of life. The timing of endometriosis did not appear to be a significant factor. Endometriosis should not be considered a contraindication for IPAA. A multidisciplinary approach addressing pain management, infertility treatment and potential hysterectomy should be considered early in patient care. 10.1111/codi.70183 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.70183
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_codi_70183
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Endometriosis and its role in pouch patients: A matched‐pair analysis
Jessica Stockheim
Mikhael Belkovsky
Lukas Schabl
Stefan D. Holubar
Scott R. Steele
Tracy Hull
Hermann Kessler
Colorectal Disease
Endometriosis and its role in pouch patients: A matched‐pair analysis Jessica Stockheim Mikhael Belkovsky Lukas Schabl Stefan D. Holubar Scott R. Steele Tracy Hull Hermann Kessler Colorectal Disease Abstract Introduction Patients requiring ileoanal pouch (IPAA) are often women of reproductive age. Outcomes in pouch patients with endometriosis have not been described. This study aimed to assess the association of endometriosis on pelvic pouch function, quality of life and pouch survival. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent IPAA between 1985 and 2022 with endometriosis were retrospectively reviewed and matched in a 1:3 ratio based on gender, diagnosis, pouch type, age at pouch creation, BMI and ASA score. Results Twenty‐two patients with endometriosis and IPAA were matched with 66 patients without endometriosis, with ulcerative colitis being the most common diagnosis in both groups (86%). Histopathological verification of endometriosis was available in 45.5% of cases. Intraoperative variables and surgery‐related postoperative complications were similar between groups, except for a higher incidence of thromboembolism in the endometriosis group (18% vs. 3%, p  = 0.04). There was no significant difference in pouchitis (73% vs. 46%, p  = 0.06), while pouch dysfunction occurred significantly more frequently in endometriosis patients (18% vs. 3%, p  = 0.03; OR 7.11, 1.53–33.10, p  = 0.01). Hysterectomy, with or without salpingo‐oophorectomy, was performed in 45% of endometriosis patients, primarily due to endometriosis and pain and most commonly (90%) following IPAA. The timing of endometriosis diagnosis (before or after IPAA) did not significantly influence perioperative outcomes. Overall quality of life was favourable in both groups (0.7 vs. 0.8, p  = 0.35). Conclusion Pouch function was inferior in endometriosis patients, yet with a comparable overall quality of life. The timing of endometriosis did not appear to be a significant factor. Endometriosis should not be considered a contraindication for IPAA. A multidisciplinary approach addressing pain management, infertility treatment and potential hysterectomy should be considered early in patient care. 10.1111/codi.70183 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Endometriosis and its role in pouch patients: A matched‐pair analysis
topic Colorectal Disease
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70183