Revisiting Age‐Related Changes in Statistical Learning: The Importance of Longitudinal Evidence

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dezső Németh, Eszter Tóth‐Fáber, Bence Farkas, Karolina Janacsek
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867009557282160640
author Dezső Németh
Eszter Tóth‐Fáber
Bence Farkas
Karolina Janacsek
author_facet Dezső Németh
Eszter Tóth‐Fáber
Bence Farkas
Karolina Janacsek
Dezső Németh
Eszter Tóth‐Fáber
Bence Farkas
Karolina Janacsek
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Revisiting Age‐Related Changes in Statistical Learning: The Importance of Longitudinal Evidence Dezső Németh Eszter Tóth‐Fáber Bence Farkas Karolina Janacsek Cognitive Science Abstract In a recent article in Cognitive Science, Rogachev et al. (2025) presented a cross‐sectional investigation of visual statistical learning (SL) in children aged 3–9 years and concluded that implicit SL remains stable across early childhood. They cited our longitudinal study (Tóth‐Fáber et al., 2024) as supporting this conclusion. Here, we clarify that this interpretation is incorrect. Using a longitudinal design tracking the same individuals from ages 7 to 14, we demonstrated a reliable developmental decline in implicit SL, along with substantial interindividual variability. We further showed that executive functions measured at age 14 predict individual developmental trajectories of SL, indicating a dynamic reorganization of learning systems with maturation. Importantly, tasks used to measure SL inevitably recruit multiple cognitive processes, and differences in these task demands can substantially influence observed developmental trajectories. We argue that longitudinal and cross‐sectional designs yield qualitatively different evidence about developmental change. Longitudinal evidence and relatively process‐pure measures are, therefore, essential for accurately characterizing developmental dynamics in SL. 10.1111/cogs.70174 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cogs.70174
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_cogs_70174
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Revisiting Age‐Related Changes in Statistical Learning: The Importance of Longitudinal Evidence
Dezső Németh
Eszter Tóth‐Fáber
Bence Farkas
Karolina Janacsek
Cognitive Science
Revisiting Age‐Related Changes in Statistical Learning: The Importance of Longitudinal Evidence Dezső Németh Eszter Tóth‐Fáber Bence Farkas Karolina Janacsek Cognitive Science Abstract In a recent article in Cognitive Science, Rogachev et al. (2025) presented a cross‐sectional investigation of visual statistical learning (SL) in children aged 3–9 years and concluded that implicit SL remains stable across early childhood. They cited our longitudinal study (Tóth‐Fáber et al., 2024) as supporting this conclusion. Here, we clarify that this interpretation is incorrect. Using a longitudinal design tracking the same individuals from ages 7 to 14, we demonstrated a reliable developmental decline in implicit SL, along with substantial interindividual variability. We further showed that executive functions measured at age 14 predict individual developmental trajectories of SL, indicating a dynamic reorganization of learning systems with maturation. Importantly, tasks used to measure SL inevitably recruit multiple cognitive processes, and differences in these task demands can substantially influence observed developmental trajectories. We argue that longitudinal and cross‐sectional designs yield qualitatively different evidence about developmental change. Longitudinal evidence and relatively process‐pure measures are, therefore, essential for accurately characterizing developmental dynamics in SL. 10.1111/cogs.70174 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Revisiting Age‐Related Changes in Statistical Learning: The Importance of Longitudinal Evidence
topic Cognitive Science
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70174