Organ Offer Review Cards: Improving Transparency on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo Open Access |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1867006140335783936 |
|---|---|
| author | Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg |
| author_facet | Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Organ Offer Review Cards: Improving Transparency on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionThe 2022 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on equity in organ transplantation highlighted limited transparency and accountability for organ offer declines and recommended prioritizing patient engagement in decisions regarding organ offers. Yet, there is no guidance on how to incorporate patients in organ offers. We elected to study the experiences of patients on the waitlist and their perception of a novel Organ Offer Review Card (OORC).MethodsA prototype OORC was created using Donornet refusal codes. Sixty randomly selected kidney waitlist patients at a single center were asked to participate in a web‐based survey focusing on current medical decision‐making preferences and perceptions of the prototype OORC.ResultsAmong the 43 patients reached, 17 (39.5%) completed the survey. Most participants (88.2%) expressed it was important to be involved in the decision‐making about organ offers, with 100.0% of respondents wanting to know why an organ was declined. Regarding the prototype OORC, 94.1% thought it helped them understand the factors and priorities considered when selecting an organ, and 88.2% said it increased their belief that their team was acting in their best interest.ConclusionAn OORC could increase transparency and communication during the waitlist process while enhancing trust in the transplant team. 10.1111/ctr.15388 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ctr.15388 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_15388 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Organ Offer Review Cards: Improving Transparency on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg Clinical Transplantation Organ Offer Review Cards: Improving Transparency on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Husain A. Rasheed Meridith Pensler Sarah Diaz Emily Roney Meredith Barrett Elizabeth M. Sonnenberg Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionThe 2022 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on equity in organ transplantation highlighted limited transparency and accountability for organ offer declines and recommended prioritizing patient engagement in decisions regarding organ offers. Yet, there is no guidance on how to incorporate patients in organ offers. We elected to study the experiences of patients on the waitlist and their perception of a novel Organ Offer Review Card (OORC).MethodsA prototype OORC was created using Donornet refusal codes. Sixty randomly selected kidney waitlist patients at a single center were asked to participate in a web‐based survey focusing on current medical decision‐making preferences and perceptions of the prototype OORC.ResultsAmong the 43 patients reached, 17 (39.5%) completed the survey. Most participants (88.2%) expressed it was important to be involved in the decision‐making about organ offers, with 100.0% of respondents wanting to know why an organ was declined. Regarding the prototype OORC, 94.1% thought it helped them understand the factors and priorities considered when selecting an organ, and 88.2% said it increased their belief that their team was acting in their best interest.ConclusionAn OORC could increase transparency and communication during the waitlist process while enhancing trust in the transplant team. 10.1111/ctr.15388 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| title | Organ Offer Review Cards: Improving Transparency on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist |
| topic | Clinical Transplantation |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15388 |