Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahad Firoz, Roh Yanagida, Mohammed Kashem, Yoshiya Toyoda, Eman Hamad
Formato: Artículo Open Access
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867008084354793472
author Ahad Firoz
Roh Yanagida
Mohammed Kashem
Yoshiya Toyoda
Eman Hamad
author_facet Ahad Firoz
Roh Yanagida
Mohammed Kashem
Yoshiya Toyoda
Eman Hamad
Ahad Firoz
Roh Yanagida
Mohammed Kashem
Yoshiya Toyoda
Eman Hamad
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes Ahad Firoz Roh Yanagida Mohammed Kashem Yoshiya Toyoda Eman Hamad Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundThere are diverse indications for heart transplantation (HTx), often categorized into ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy. Although there is extensive research comparing the outcomes for these disease processes following certain therapeutic interventions, there are limited data on how recipient etiology impacts post‐HTx survival. Our investigation seeks to identify this relationship.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using adult HTx patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2021. Patients with a combined heart–lung transplant or previous HTx were excluded. ICM included coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. NICM included nonischemic dilated (NIDCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and restrictive (RCM) cardiomyopathy. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves, log‐rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models.ResultsA total of 42 268 patients were included in our study. Recipients with ICM were older and more likely to be males, obese, diabetics, and smokers. We found that patients with ICM had an increased incidence of transplant CAD (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001) and risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, p < 0.001) compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM had a similar hazard risk compared to ICM (HR = 1.03, p = 0.650), whereas both NIDCM (HR = 0.81, p < 0.001) and HCM (HR = 0.70, p < 0.001) had improved survival.ConclusionOur study provides evidence to suggest that ICM has decreased survival when compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM was found to have an increased mortality risk similar to ICM, whereas NIDCM and HCM both had superior outcomes. The clinical implication of this investigation will allow clinicians to better understand the prognosis of certain patient groups. 10.1111/ctr.15450 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.15450
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_15450
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes
Ahad Firoz
Roh Yanagida
Mohammed Kashem
Yoshiya Toyoda
Eman Hamad
Clinical Transplantation
Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes Ahad Firoz Roh Yanagida Mohammed Kashem Yoshiya Toyoda Eman Hamad Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundThere are diverse indications for heart transplantation (HTx), often categorized into ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy. Although there is extensive research comparing the outcomes for these disease processes following certain therapeutic interventions, there are limited data on how recipient etiology impacts post‐HTx survival. Our investigation seeks to identify this relationship.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using adult HTx patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2021. Patients with a combined heart–lung transplant or previous HTx were excluded. ICM included coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. NICM included nonischemic dilated (NIDCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and restrictive (RCM) cardiomyopathy. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves, log‐rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models.ResultsA total of 42 268 patients were included in our study. Recipients with ICM were older and more likely to be males, obese, diabetics, and smokers. We found that patients with ICM had an increased incidence of transplant CAD (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001) and risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, p < 0.001) compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM had a similar hazard risk compared to ICM (HR = 1.03, p = 0.650), whereas both NIDCM (HR = 0.81, p < 0.001) and HCM (HR = 0.70, p < 0.001) had improved survival.ConclusionOur study provides evidence to suggest that ICM has decreased survival when compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM was found to have an increased mortality risk similar to ICM, whereas NIDCM and HCM both had superior outcomes. The clinical implication of this investigation will allow clinicians to better understand the prognosis of certain patient groups. 10.1111/ctr.15450 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15450