Variation Across Organ Procurement Organizations in Deceased‐Donor Kidney Offer Notification Practices

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: David C. Cron, Arnold E. Kuk, Layla Parast, S. Ali Husain, Vanessa M. Welten, Miko Yu, Sumit Mohan, Joel T. Adler
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867007517125509120
author David C. Cron
Arnold E. Kuk
Layla Parast
S. Ali Husain
Vanessa M. Welten
Miko Yu
Sumit Mohan
Joel T. Adler
author_facet David C. Cron
Arnold E. Kuk
Layla Parast
S. Ali Husain
Vanessa M. Welten
Miko Yu
Sumit Mohan
Joel T. Adler
David C. Cron
Arnold E. Kuk
Layla Parast
S. Ali Husain
Vanessa M. Welten
Miko Yu
Sumit Mohan
Joel T. Adler
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Variation Across Organ Procurement Organizations in Deceased‐Donor Kidney Offer Notification Practices David C. Cron Arnold E. Kuk Layla Parast S. Ali Husain Vanessa M. Welten Miko Yu Sumit Mohan Joel T. Adler Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionHow offer notifications are distributed early in the kidney allocation timeline, including how widely they are offered, is unclear. A better understanding of offer notification practices across organ procurement organizations (OPOs) may identify opportunities for more efficient allocation.MethodsWe merged the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients potential transplant recipient file with additional offer notification time stamps to identify 54 631 deceased‐donor kidney match runs from 2017 to 2023. Offer notifications for a given match run are sent to candidates/centers in “batches.” We quantified the number of offers in the initial batch—which theoretically reflects the OPO's initial estimate of how widely a kidney should be offered—and compared this metric across OPOs.ResultsKidneys were offered to a median of 14 candidates (IQR 9–38) in the first batch of notifications, and this varied across OPOs from 3 to 746 candidates per initial batch. Batch size at the OPO‐level did not correlate with rank at kidney placement or OPO nonuse rate. OPOs in the highest quartile of batch size sent more offers (median 100) than presumably necessary to place kidneys (median rank at placement 21), and OPOs in the lowest quartile of batch size sent fewer offers (6) than needed to place kidneys (rank at placement 19).ConclusionsOffer notification practices vary widely across OPOs, and many OPOs offer kidneys far more widely than necessary for placement. Optimization of offer notification practices may reduce unnecessary communications. Further research into allocation processes is needed to identify opportunities to improve efficiency of allocation for OPOs and transplant centers. 10.1111/ctr.70024 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70024
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70024
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Variation Across Organ Procurement Organizations in Deceased‐Donor Kidney Offer Notification Practices
David C. Cron
Arnold E. Kuk
Layla Parast
S. Ali Husain
Vanessa M. Welten
Miko Yu
Sumit Mohan
Joel T. Adler
Clinical Transplantation
Variation Across Organ Procurement Organizations in Deceased‐Donor Kidney Offer Notification Practices David C. Cron Arnold E. Kuk Layla Parast S. Ali Husain Vanessa M. Welten Miko Yu Sumit Mohan Joel T. Adler Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionHow offer notifications are distributed early in the kidney allocation timeline, including how widely they are offered, is unclear. A better understanding of offer notification practices across organ procurement organizations (OPOs) may identify opportunities for more efficient allocation.MethodsWe merged the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients potential transplant recipient file with additional offer notification time stamps to identify 54 631 deceased‐donor kidney match runs from 2017 to 2023. Offer notifications for a given match run are sent to candidates/centers in “batches.” We quantified the number of offers in the initial batch—which theoretically reflects the OPO's initial estimate of how widely a kidney should be offered—and compared this metric across OPOs.ResultsKidneys were offered to a median of 14 candidates (IQR 9–38) in the first batch of notifications, and this varied across OPOs from 3 to 746 candidates per initial batch. Batch size at the OPO‐level did not correlate with rank at kidney placement or OPO nonuse rate. OPOs in the highest quartile of batch size sent more offers (median 100) than presumably necessary to place kidneys (median rank at placement 21), and OPOs in the lowest quartile of batch size sent fewer offers (6) than needed to place kidneys (rank at placement 19).ConclusionsOffer notification practices vary widely across OPOs, and many OPOs offer kidneys far more widely than necessary for placement. Optimization of offer notification practices may reduce unnecessary communications. Further research into allocation processes is needed to identify opportunities to improve efficiency of allocation for OPOs and transplant centers. 10.1111/ctr.70024 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Variation Across Organ Procurement Organizations in Deceased‐Donor Kidney Offer Notification Practices
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70024