Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70137 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Automated CT Image Processing for the Diagnosis, Prediction, and Differentiation of Phenotypes in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation Stefan Kuhnert Nermin Halim Janine Sommerlad Henning Gall Athiththan Yogeswaran Fritz C. Roller Gabriele Krombach Martin Reichert Ingolf Askevold Andreas Hecker Christian Koch Werner Seeger Konstantin Mayer Oliver Weinheimer Matthias Hecker Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundChronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation is a common complication with a poor prognosis. We assessed the utility of quantitative computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis, prediction, and discrimination of CLAD phenotypes.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed routine inspiratory and expiratory CT scans from 78 patients at different time points after lung transplantation. Mean lung density (MLD), parametric response mapping (PRM), percentage of air trapping, and airway wall morphology parameters were calculated using the image processing software YACTA. Diagnostic and predictive utility was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis and Pearson correlation.ResultsMarkers of air trapping showed promise for the diagnosis and prediction of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS); for example, expiratory MLD showed areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.905 for diagnosis and 0.729 for 1‐year prediction. For diagnosis of CLAD with mixed phenotype, peripheral measurements (e.g., PRM of peripheral functional small airway disease: AUC 0.893) were most suitable. Markers of airway thickening (e.g., expiratory wall thickness at an inner perimeter of 10 mm: AUC 0.767) gave good diagnostic values for the undefined phenotype. CT biomarkers differed significantly among CLAD phenotypes.ConclusionsDifferent CT biomarkers are suitable for the diagnosis of CLAD phenotypes, prediction of BOS, and differentiation of CLAD phenotypes. 10.1111/ctr.70137 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor