Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Alvin G. Thomas, Sarah Hussain, Samantha B. Klitenic, Carolyn N. Sidoti, Madeleine M. Waldram, Amy Chang, Jennifer D. Motter, Kelly Terlizzi, Allan B. Massie, Mary Schofield, Karol Barstow, Adam Bingaman, Dorry L. Segev, Macey L. Levan
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70139
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867010523844837376
author Alvin G. Thomas
Sarah Hussain
Samantha B. Klitenic
Carolyn N. Sidoti
Madeleine M. Waldram
Amy Chang
Jennifer D. Motter
Kelly Terlizzi
Allan B. Massie
Mary Schofield
Karol Barstow
Adam Bingaman
Dorry L. Segev
Macey L. Levan
author_facet Alvin G. Thomas
Sarah Hussain
Samantha B. Klitenic
Carolyn N. Sidoti
Madeleine M. Waldram
Amy Chang
Jennifer D. Motter
Kelly Terlizzi
Allan B. Massie
Mary Schofield
Karol Barstow
Adam Bingaman
Dorry L. Segev
Macey L. Levan
Alvin G. Thomas
Sarah Hussain
Samantha B. Klitenic
Carolyn N. Sidoti
Madeleine M. Waldram
Amy Chang
Jennifer D. Motter
Kelly Terlizzi
Allan B. Massie
Mary Schofield
Karol Barstow
Adam Bingaman
Dorry L. Segev
Macey L. Levan
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Effectiveness of a Mobile Health System on Compliance With 2‐Year Living Kidney Donor Follow‐Up in the United States Alvin G. Thomas Sarah Hussain Samantha B. Klitenic Carolyn N. Sidoti Madeleine M. Waldram Amy Chang Jennifer D. Motter Kelly Terlizzi Allan B. Massie Mary Schofield Karol Barstow Adam Bingaman Dorry L. Segev Macey L. Levan Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy requires 2 years of follow‐up for living kidney donors (LKDs); however, many transplant hospitals struggle to meet this requirement. We developed and tested a mobile health (mHealth) system for LKD follow‐up in a pilot randomized‐controlled trial (RCT).MethodsLKDs were randomly assigned to either the intervention (mHealth + standard of care) or control arm (standard of care). We assessed OPTN policy‐defined completeness and timeliness of 6‐month, 1‐year, and 2‐year follow‐ups. Four hundred LKDs were enrolled in the study (June 2018 to February 2021).ResultsAt 6‐month follow‐up, a higher proportion of the intervention arm participants completed composite visits (97.5% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.01). Both arms had similar compliance rates at 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐up (92.0% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.49, and 66.5% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.83). Intervention arm participants completed 6‐month follow‐up 11 days earlier than their counterparts (p = 0.009).ConclusionmHealth technologies improved 6‐month follow‐up, but did not impact 1‐ and 2‐year LKD follow‐up in this single‐center RCT. Other strategies, such as providing services beyond data collection, may be necessary to improve donor engagement and support LDK's long‐term follow‐up. 10.1111/ctr.70139 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70139
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70139
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Effectiveness of a Mobile Health System on Compliance With 2‐Year Living Kidney Donor Follow‐Up in the United States
Alvin G. Thomas
Sarah Hussain
Samantha B. Klitenic
Carolyn N. Sidoti
Madeleine M. Waldram
Amy Chang
Jennifer D. Motter
Kelly Terlizzi
Allan B. Massie
Mary Schofield
Karol Barstow
Adam Bingaman
Dorry L. Segev
Macey L. Levan
Clinical Transplantation
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health System on Compliance With 2‐Year Living Kidney Donor Follow‐Up in the United States Alvin G. Thomas Sarah Hussain Samantha B. Klitenic Carolyn N. Sidoti Madeleine M. Waldram Amy Chang Jennifer D. Motter Kelly Terlizzi Allan B. Massie Mary Schofield Karol Barstow Adam Bingaman Dorry L. Segev Macey L. Levan Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy requires 2 years of follow‐up for living kidney donors (LKDs); however, many transplant hospitals struggle to meet this requirement. We developed and tested a mobile health (mHealth) system for LKD follow‐up in a pilot randomized‐controlled trial (RCT).MethodsLKDs were randomly assigned to either the intervention (mHealth + standard of care) or control arm (standard of care). We assessed OPTN policy‐defined completeness and timeliness of 6‐month, 1‐year, and 2‐year follow‐ups. Four hundred LKDs were enrolled in the study (June 2018 to February 2021).ResultsAt 6‐month follow‐up, a higher proportion of the intervention arm participants completed composite visits (97.5% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.01). Both arms had similar compliance rates at 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐up (92.0% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.49, and 66.5% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.83). Intervention arm participants completed 6‐month follow‐up 11 days earlier than their counterparts (p = 0.009).ConclusionmHealth technologies improved 6‐month follow‐up, but did not impact 1‐ and 2‐year LKD follow‐up in this single‐center RCT. Other strategies, such as providing services beyond data collection, may be necessary to improve donor engagement and support LDK's long‐term follow‐up. 10.1111/ctr.70139 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Effectiveness of a Mobile Health System on Compliance With 2‐Year Living Kidney Donor Follow‐Up in the United States
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70139