Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze, Medhat Askar, Matthew Cooper, Lynn D. Cornell, Emanuele Cozzi, Darshana M. Dadhania, Fritz Diekmann, Aiko P. J. de Vries, Carrie A. Schinstock, Robert P. Carroll, Ahmad Abdelrehim, Geliang Gan, Yanhong Deng, Sami Alasfar, Serena M. Bagnasco, Ibrahim Batal, Klemens Budde, Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen, Vanderlene L. Kung, Fritz Lower, Mariana Seija, Edward Kraus, Maarten Naesens, Laurine M. Bow
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867017889446363136
author Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze
Medhat Askar
Matthew Cooper
Lynn D. Cornell
Emanuele Cozzi
Darshana M. Dadhania
Fritz Diekmann
Aiko P. J. de Vries
Carrie A. Schinstock
Robert P. Carroll
Ahmad Abdelrehim
Geliang Gan
Yanhong Deng
Sami Alasfar
Serena M. Bagnasco
Ibrahim Batal
Klemens Budde
Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen
Vanderlene L. Kung
Fritz Lower
Mariana Seija
Edward Kraus
Maarten Naesens
Laurine M. Bow
author_facet Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze
Medhat Askar
Matthew Cooper
Lynn D. Cornell
Emanuele Cozzi
Darshana M. Dadhania
Fritz Diekmann
Aiko P. J. de Vries
Carrie A. Schinstock
Robert P. Carroll
Ahmad Abdelrehim
Geliang Gan
Yanhong Deng
Sami Alasfar
Serena M. Bagnasco
Ibrahim Batal
Klemens Budde
Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen
Vanderlene L. Kung
Fritz Lower
Mariana Seija
Edward Kraus
Maarten Naesens
Laurine M. Bow
Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze
Medhat Askar
Matthew Cooper
Lynn D. Cornell
Emanuele Cozzi
Darshana M. Dadhania
Fritz Diekmann
Aiko P. J. de Vries
Carrie A. Schinstock
Robert P. Carroll
Ahmad Abdelrehim
Geliang Gan
Yanhong Deng
Sami Alasfar
Serena M. Bagnasco
Ibrahim Batal
Klemens Budde
Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen
Vanderlene L. Kung
Fritz Lower
Mariana Seija
Edward Kraus
Maarten Naesens
Laurine M. Bow
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze Medhat Askar Matthew Cooper Lynn D. Cornell Emanuele Cozzi Darshana M. Dadhania Fritz Diekmann Aiko P. J. de Vries Carrie A. Schinstock Robert P. Carroll Ahmad Abdelrehim Geliang Gan Yanhong Deng Sami Alasfar Serena M. Bagnasco Ibrahim Batal Klemens Budde Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen Vanderlene L. Kung Fritz Lower Mariana Seija Edward Kraus Maarten Naesens Laurine M. Bow Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionThe diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) requires input from several transplant professionals. Bringing clinical and laboratory experts together may help standardize care. Yet, little is known about current global practices of multidisciplinary meetings for AMR management.MethodsThe Banff Antibody‐Mediated Injury Working Group approached professional societies worldwide to distribute a survey on the availability, content, participants, perceived value, and barriers to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings.ResultsFour hundred two transplant professionals from six continents caring for kidney (90.55%), liver (21.14%), pancreas (20.65%), heart (15.17%), and lung (14.18%) transplant recipients participated in the survey, and 302 (75.12%) reported attending multidisciplinary meetings. Multidisciplinary meetings were more prevalent in academic centers, in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (81.03% and 65.99%, respectively; p < 0.001), and in mid‐to‐large size transplant programs compared to smaller programs. Perceived value included continued professional development (97.68%) and trainee education (95.70%). AMR was reported to be discussed at these meetings by 217 respondents with case presentations reviewing patient characteristics, histology, and HLA antibody data. A third of the respondents reviewed non‐HLA/pathogenic autoantibodies and/or molecular diagnostics, with the latter being more frequently applied in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (46.71% and 12.31%, respectively; p < 0.001). AMR case presentations allowed diagnosis revision, actionable management plans and were perceived as improving care. The primary barrier to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings (63.27%) was the unavailability of transplant professionals (e.g., transplant immunologists).ConclusionFacilitating multidisciplinary meetings through the remote participation of pertinent experts and incentivizing participation through remuneration, protected time, or continued medical education may help standardize AMR diagnosis and harmonize its management. 10.1111/ctr.70167 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70167
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70167
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations
Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze
Medhat Askar
Matthew Cooper
Lynn D. Cornell
Emanuele Cozzi
Darshana M. Dadhania
Fritz Diekmann
Aiko P. J. de Vries
Carrie A. Schinstock
Robert P. Carroll
Ahmad Abdelrehim
Geliang Gan
Yanhong Deng
Sami Alasfar
Serena M. Bagnasco
Ibrahim Batal
Klemens Budde
Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen
Vanderlene L. Kung
Fritz Lower
Mariana Seija
Edward Kraus
Maarten Naesens
Laurine M. Bow
Clinical Transplantation
Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze Medhat Askar Matthew Cooper Lynn D. Cornell Emanuele Cozzi Darshana M. Dadhania Fritz Diekmann Aiko P. J. de Vries Carrie A. Schinstock Robert P. Carroll Ahmad Abdelrehim Geliang Gan Yanhong Deng Sami Alasfar Serena M. Bagnasco Ibrahim Batal Klemens Budde Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen Vanderlene L. Kung Fritz Lower Mariana Seija Edward Kraus Maarten Naesens Laurine M. Bow Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTIntroductionThe diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) requires input from several transplant professionals. Bringing clinical and laboratory experts together may help standardize care. Yet, little is known about current global practices of multidisciplinary meetings for AMR management.MethodsThe Banff Antibody‐Mediated Injury Working Group approached professional societies worldwide to distribute a survey on the availability, content, participants, perceived value, and barriers to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings.ResultsFour hundred two transplant professionals from six continents caring for kidney (90.55%), liver (21.14%), pancreas (20.65%), heart (15.17%), and lung (14.18%) transplant recipients participated in the survey, and 302 (75.12%) reported attending multidisciplinary meetings. Multidisciplinary meetings were more prevalent in academic centers, in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (81.03% and 65.99%, respectively; p < 0.001), and in mid‐to‐large size transplant programs compared to smaller programs. Perceived value included continued professional development (97.68%) and trainee education (95.70%). AMR was reported to be discussed at these meetings by 217 respondents with case presentations reviewing patient characteristics, histology, and HLA antibody data. A third of the respondents reviewed non‐HLA/pathogenic autoantibodies and/or molecular diagnostics, with the latter being more frequently applied in high‐ versus low‐to‐middle‐income regions (46.71% and 12.31%, respectively; p < 0.001). AMR case presentations allowed diagnosis revision, actionable management plans and were perceived as improving care. The primary barrier to the implementation of multidisciplinary meetings (63.27%) was the unavailability of transplant professionals (e.g., transplant immunologists).ConclusionFacilitating multidisciplinary meetings through the remote participation of pertinent experts and incentivizing participation through remuneration, protected time, or continued medical education may help standardize AMR diagnosis and harmonize its management. 10.1111/ctr.70167 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
title Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70167