Renal Function in Sequential Living Kidney‐Then‐Liver Donors Undergoing Right Lobe Donation: A Two‐Center Case Study

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Daisuke Imai, Zachary P. Rokop, Masaya Yokoyama, Amit Sharma, Plamen Mihaylov, John Powelson, Seung Duk Lee, Muhammad I. Saeed, Dhiren Kumar, Asif Sharfuddin, Rachel Holmes, Marco Lacerda, Joel Wedd, Jill M. Bruno, Jordan K. Swensson, David A. Bruno, Chandrashekhar A. Kubal, Vinay Kumaran
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867021409659650048
author Daisuke Imai
Zachary P. Rokop
Masaya Yokoyama
Amit Sharma
Plamen Mihaylov
John Powelson
Seung Duk Lee
Muhammad I. Saeed
Dhiren Kumar
Asif Sharfuddin
Rachel Holmes
Marco Lacerda
Joel Wedd
Jill M. Bruno
Jordan K. Swensson
David A. Bruno
Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
Vinay Kumaran
author_facet Daisuke Imai
Zachary P. Rokop
Masaya Yokoyama
Amit Sharma
Plamen Mihaylov
John Powelson
Seung Duk Lee
Muhammad I. Saeed
Dhiren Kumar
Asif Sharfuddin
Rachel Holmes
Marco Lacerda
Joel Wedd
Jill M. Bruno
Jordan K. Swensson
David A. Bruno
Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
Vinay Kumaran
Daisuke Imai
Zachary P. Rokop
Masaya Yokoyama
Amit Sharma
Plamen Mihaylov
John Powelson
Seung Duk Lee
Muhammad I. Saeed
Dhiren Kumar
Asif Sharfuddin
Rachel Holmes
Marco Lacerda
Joel Wedd
Jill M. Bruno
Jordan K. Swensson
David A. Bruno
Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
Vinay Kumaran
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Renal Function in Sequential Living Kidney‐Then‐Liver Donors Undergoing Right Lobe Donation: A Two‐Center Case Study Daisuke Imai Zachary P. Rokop Masaya Yokoyama Amit Sharma Plamen Mihaylov John Powelson Seung Duk Lee Muhammad I. Saeed Dhiren Kumar Asif Sharfuddin Rachel Holmes Marco Lacerda Joel Wedd Jill M. Bruno Jordan K. Swensson David A. Bruno Chandrashekhar A. Kubal Vinay Kumaran Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundThere are concerns regarding the potential impact of living donor hepatectomy on the kidney function of prior kidney donors. The current literature lacks comprehensive data on living liver following living kidney donation. Furthermore, the focus on left lobe donation in the literature does not fully represent the prevalent use of the right lobe graft for living liver transplants in the United States.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review on all living liver donors who had previously donated a kidney at two US centers.ResultsThere were 14 sequential living kidney‐then‐liver donors. The median donor age was 49 years (range 35–59). Most of these (12 donors) were nondirected donations. The median follow‐up period was 24 months (range 1–129). The median interval between the donations was 32 months (range 17–154 months). All donors donated the right lobe with 43.5% (range 31.4%–49.9 %) of remnant liver volume. The overall donor complication rate was 43%, seen in six donors, with one Clavien–Dindo Grade IIIa complication (suture granuloma removal under local anesthesia). Two donors (14%) experienced stage 1 AKI, both resolving with supportive care. A decrease in eGFR greater than 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 over the follow‐up was observed in only one donor, who gained weight and was lost to follow‐up. Compensatory kidney hypertrophy was observed, with kidney volumetry showing an increase of 1.27 (1.09–1.39) times pre‐ versus post‐kidney donation and 1.08 times pre‐ versus post‐liver donation (1.01–1.16).ConclusionsRight lobe living liver donation in previous kidney donors might be safely performed in terms of midterm kidney function. Longer‐term assessment in a larger cohort would be necessary to have better insight into this unique donor group. 10.1111/ctr.70168 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70168
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70168
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Renal Function in Sequential Living Kidney‐Then‐Liver Donors Undergoing Right Lobe Donation: A Two‐Center Case Study
Daisuke Imai
Zachary P. Rokop
Masaya Yokoyama
Amit Sharma
Plamen Mihaylov
John Powelson
Seung Duk Lee
Muhammad I. Saeed
Dhiren Kumar
Asif Sharfuddin
Rachel Holmes
Marco Lacerda
Joel Wedd
Jill M. Bruno
Jordan K. Swensson
David A. Bruno
Chandrashekhar A. Kubal
Vinay Kumaran
Clinical Transplantation
Renal Function in Sequential Living Kidney‐Then‐Liver Donors Undergoing Right Lobe Donation: A Two‐Center Case Study Daisuke Imai Zachary P. Rokop Masaya Yokoyama Amit Sharma Plamen Mihaylov John Powelson Seung Duk Lee Muhammad I. Saeed Dhiren Kumar Asif Sharfuddin Rachel Holmes Marco Lacerda Joel Wedd Jill M. Bruno Jordan K. Swensson David A. Bruno Chandrashekhar A. Kubal Vinay Kumaran Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundThere are concerns regarding the potential impact of living donor hepatectomy on the kidney function of prior kidney donors. The current literature lacks comprehensive data on living liver following living kidney donation. Furthermore, the focus on left lobe donation in the literature does not fully represent the prevalent use of the right lobe graft for living liver transplants in the United States.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review on all living liver donors who had previously donated a kidney at two US centers.ResultsThere were 14 sequential living kidney‐then‐liver donors. The median donor age was 49 years (range 35–59). Most of these (12 donors) were nondirected donations. The median follow‐up period was 24 months (range 1–129). The median interval between the donations was 32 months (range 17–154 months). All donors donated the right lobe with 43.5% (range 31.4%–49.9 %) of remnant liver volume. The overall donor complication rate was 43%, seen in six donors, with one Clavien–Dindo Grade IIIa complication (suture granuloma removal under local anesthesia). Two donors (14%) experienced stage 1 AKI, both resolving with supportive care. A decrease in eGFR greater than 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 over the follow‐up was observed in only one donor, who gained weight and was lost to follow‐up. Compensatory kidney hypertrophy was observed, with kidney volumetry showing an increase of 1.27 (1.09–1.39) times pre‐ versus post‐kidney donation and 1.08 times pre‐ versus post‐liver donation (1.01–1.16).ConclusionsRight lobe living liver donation in previous kidney donors might be safely performed in terms of midterm kidney function. Longer‐term assessment in a larger cohort would be necessary to have better insight into this unique donor group. 10.1111/ctr.70168 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Renal Function in Sequential Living Kidney‐Then‐Liver Donors Undergoing Right Lobe Donation: A Two‐Center Case Study
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70168