Where Do Organ Donors Come From in the United States? An Analysis of Urban and Rural Donation
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867007223570366464 |
|---|---|
| author | Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana |
| author_facet | Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | Where Do Organ Donors Come From in the United States? An Analysis of Urban and Rural Donation Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundOne of the primary limiting factors in organ transplantation is limited supply of deceased donor allografts. Although there are multiple potential strategies to increase transplantation access, increasing donor organ supply remains a priority. This study aims to analyze the origins of donor supply based on donor and hospital ZIP codes.MethodsOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) deceased donor database was analyzed. ZIP codes were assigned Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) code based on definitions from the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. These RUCA codes, ranging from 1 (metropolitan core) to 10 (rural), allowed for a census‐based classification of donor residential ZIP codes. Donor density was calculated as donors per million population. Proportionality between donor rurality was compared to general mortality data from the CDC WONDER database. Statistical analysis was performed in Stata 17.0.ResultsRural zones and micropolitan zones supply 7.2% and 9.7% of donors despite accounting for 8.5% and 10.7% of deaths, respectively. In contrast, urban zones yield 83.1% of donors while accounting for 80.8% of deaths. Donors from rural and micropolitan regions were on average younger and more likely to have trauma‐related mechanisms of death, while being less likely to be expanded criteria donors (ECD) or to have required pressor support. Lastly, rural and micropolitan donors were more likely to have written intent to donate.ConclusionThe donor supply from rural and micropolitan regions is not fully reflective of their population size or donor potential. These communities may represent a valuable opportunity to expand the national donor pool through continued outreach and collaboration. 10.1111/ctr.70231 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ctr.70231 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70231 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | Where Do Organ Donors Come From in the United States? An Analysis of Urban and Rural Donation Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana Clinical Transplantation Where Do Organ Donors Come From in the United States? An Analysis of Urban and Rural Donation Anthony Shadid Carolyn Chen Elizabeth L. Godfrey Addison Xu John Goss Abbas Rana Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACTBackgroundOne of the primary limiting factors in organ transplantation is limited supply of deceased donor allografts. Although there are multiple potential strategies to increase transplantation access, increasing donor organ supply remains a priority. This study aims to analyze the origins of donor supply based on donor and hospital ZIP codes.MethodsOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) deceased donor database was analyzed. ZIP codes were assigned Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) code based on definitions from the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. These RUCA codes, ranging from 1 (metropolitan core) to 10 (rural), allowed for a census‐based classification of donor residential ZIP codes. Donor density was calculated as donors per million population. Proportionality between donor rurality was compared to general mortality data from the CDC WONDER database. Statistical analysis was performed in Stata 17.0.ResultsRural zones and micropolitan zones supply 7.2% and 9.7% of donors despite accounting for 8.5% and 10.7% of deaths, respectively. In contrast, urban zones yield 83.1% of donors while accounting for 80.8% of deaths. Donors from rural and micropolitan regions were on average younger and more likely to have trauma‐related mechanisms of death, while being less likely to be expanded criteria donors (ECD) or to have required pressor support. Lastly, rural and micropolitan donors were more likely to have written intent to donate.ConclusionThe donor supply from rural and micropolitan regions is not fully reflective of their population size or donor potential. These communities may represent a valuable opportunity to expand the national donor pool through continued outreach and collaboration. 10.1111/ctr.70231 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| title | Where Do Organ Donors Come From in the United States? An Analysis of Urban and Rural Donation |
| topic | Clinical Transplantation |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70231 |