Sirolimus Plus Low‐Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor‐Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Yanfei Lu, Min Wu, Zhenbin Wei, Lingling Shi, Yongrong Lai, Rongrong Liu
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867013868707905536
author Yanfei Lu
Min Wu
Zhenbin Wei
Lingling Shi
Yongrong Lai
Rongrong Liu
author_facet Yanfei Lu
Min Wu
Zhenbin Wei
Lingling Shi
Yongrong Lai
Rongrong Liu
Yanfei Lu
Min Wu
Zhenbin Wei
Lingling Shi
Yongrong Lai
Rongrong Liu
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Sirolimus Plus Low‐Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor‐Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study Yanfei Lu Min Wu Zhenbin Wei Lingling Shi Yongrong Lai Rongrong Liu Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background Graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long‐term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low‐exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI‐intolerant recipients undergoing allo‐HSCT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo‐HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution. Results The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow‐up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non‐relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse‐related deaths. The alternative regimen was well‐tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution. Conclusion For allo‐HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low‐exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted. 10.1111/ctr.70306 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70306
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70306
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Sirolimus Plus Low‐Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor‐Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study
Yanfei Lu
Min Wu
Zhenbin Wei
Lingling Shi
Yongrong Lai
Rongrong Liu
Clinical Transplantation
Sirolimus Plus Low‐Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor‐Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study Yanfei Lu Min Wu Zhenbin Wei Lingling Shi Yongrong Lai Rongrong Liu Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background Graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long‐term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low‐exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI‐intolerant recipients undergoing allo‐HSCT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo‐HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution. Results The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow‐up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non‐relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse‐related deaths. The alternative regimen was well‐tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution. Conclusion For allo‐HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low‐exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted. 10.1111/ctr.70306 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Sirolimus Plus Low‐Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor‐Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70306