Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation: Some Centers are Doing Better Than Others

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Dominic Amara, Arielle Grieco, David Foley, Stuart Greenstein, Ryutaro Hirose, Justin Parekh
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867015648669859840
author Dominic Amara
Arielle Grieco
David Foley
Stuart Greenstein
Ryutaro Hirose
Justin Parekh
author_facet Dominic Amara
Arielle Grieco
David Foley
Stuart Greenstein
Ryutaro Hirose
Justin Parekh
Dominic Amara
Arielle Grieco
David Foley
Stuart Greenstein
Ryutaro Hirose
Justin Parekh
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation: Some Centers are Doing Better Than Others Dominic Amara Arielle Grieco David Foley Stuart Greenstein Ryutaro Hirose Justin Parekh Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infection after kidney transplantation and a source of significant morbidity and cost. The extent to which UTI rates vary across transplant centers remains unclear. Methods We analyzed kidney transplant recipients with operation dates 3/2017–7/2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Transplant beta phase pilot database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30‐day UTI. A hierarchical logistic model was used to assess center outlier status. Results A total of 5128 kidney recipients at 25 transplant centers were included. Overall, 30‐day UTI incidence was 6.1% ( n  = 312). Variation existed between centers (range: 0%–12.9%) in unadjusted analyses with five centers identified as outliers. Ureteral stent use (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.45–3.75, p  < 0.01), longer urinary catheter duration (OR 1.03 per day, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p  < 0.01), female gender (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.76–2.84, p  < 0.01) and recipient age (OR 1.01 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.02, p  < 0.01) were all independently associated with higher UTI risk. These variables were found to explain 17% of the variation in UTI rate among centers. After adjustment, three centers were still identified as outliers. Conclusions Early UTI incidence varies widely across United States transplant centers. Established risk factors explain some but not all the center variation. Future collaboration and comparison of practices across centers would help to reduce post‐transplant complications such as UTIs. 10.1111/ctr.70357 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70357
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70357
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation: Some Centers are Doing Better Than Others
Dominic Amara
Arielle Grieco
David Foley
Stuart Greenstein
Ryutaro Hirose
Justin Parekh
Clinical Transplantation
Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation: Some Centers are Doing Better Than Others Dominic Amara Arielle Grieco David Foley Stuart Greenstein Ryutaro Hirose Justin Parekh Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infection after kidney transplantation and a source of significant morbidity and cost. The extent to which UTI rates vary across transplant centers remains unclear. Methods We analyzed kidney transplant recipients with operation dates 3/2017–7/2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Transplant beta phase pilot database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30‐day UTI. A hierarchical logistic model was used to assess center outlier status. Results A total of 5128 kidney recipients at 25 transplant centers were included. Overall, 30‐day UTI incidence was 6.1% ( n  = 312). Variation existed between centers (range: 0%–12.9%) in unadjusted analyses with five centers identified as outliers. Ureteral stent use (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.45–3.75, p  < 0.01), longer urinary catheter duration (OR 1.03 per day, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, p  < 0.01), female gender (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.76–2.84, p  < 0.01) and recipient age (OR 1.01 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.02, p  < 0.01) were all independently associated with higher UTI risk. These variables were found to explain 17% of the variation in UTI rate among centers. After adjustment, three centers were still identified as outliers. Conclusions Early UTI incidence varies widely across United States transplant centers. Established risk factors explain some but not all the center variation. Future collaboration and comparison of practices across centers would help to reduce post‐transplant complications such as UTIs. 10.1111/ctr.70357 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Urinary Tract Infection After Kidney Transplantation: Some Centers are Doing Better Than Others
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70357