Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70372 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Normothermic Perfusion Versus Static Cold Storage in Liver Transplantation: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials Heithem Jeddou Stylianos Tzedakis Hector Prudhomme Aline Wautier Corentin Sumner Eya Ben Nejma Mohamad Ali Zorkot Raffaele Vincenzo De Rosa Gennaro Mazzarella Mohamed Ali Chaouch Michel Samson Karim Boudjema Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is an alternative to static cold storage (SCS) for liver graft preservation, potentially reducing ischemia–reperfusion injury and improving organ utilization. Methods We systematically reviewed RCTs comparing end‐ischemic NMP with SCS in adult liver transplantation (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL to July 9, 2025). Outcomes of interest included early allograft dysfunction (EAD), organ utilization, patient and graft survival, peak AST, primary non‐function (PNF), and biliary complications. Results Four RCTs (801 patients; NMP 418; SCS 383) met inclusion. NMP reduced EAD [16.4% vs. 27.2%; RR 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.38–0.99; p = 0.05] and increased organ utilization (75.5% vs. 69.4%; RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.18; p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed for patient or graft survival, peak AST, PNF, or biliary complications, though the latter trended in favor of NMP (RR 0.73, p = 0.07). Conclusion In adult liver transplantation, NMP reduces EAD and improves organ utilization compared with SCS, without significant differences in survival or major postoperative complications. Evidence remains limited to few trials; larger RCTs are needed to assess long‐term benefits. 10.1111/ctr.70372 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/