Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Ye In Christopher Kwon, Brian Bao, Jack Guiry, David T. Zhu, Alan Lai, Matthew Ambrosio, Aditya Kesari, Jay Patel, Zachary Fitch, Josue Chery, Patricia Nicolato, Vigneshwar Kasirajan, Zubair A. Hashmi
Natura: Artículo Open Access
Pubblicazione: Wiley 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70439
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1867014512687710208
author Ye In Christopher Kwon
Brian Bao
Jack Guiry
David T. Zhu
Alan Lai
Matthew Ambrosio
Aditya Kesari
Jay Patel
Zachary Fitch
Josue Chery
Patricia Nicolato
Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Zubair A. Hashmi
author_facet Ye In Christopher Kwon
Brian Bao
Jack Guiry
David T. Zhu
Alan Lai
Matthew Ambrosio
Aditya Kesari
Jay Patel
Zachary Fitch
Josue Chery
Patricia Nicolato
Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Zubair A. Hashmi
Ye In Christopher Kwon
Brian Bao
Jack Guiry
David T. Zhu
Alan Lai
Matthew Ambrosio
Aditya Kesari
Jay Patel
Zachary Fitch
Josue Chery
Patricia Nicolato
Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Zubair A. Hashmi
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Evolving Long‐Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using COVID‐19 Positive Donors Ye In Christopher Kwon Brian Bao Jack Guiry David T. Zhu Alan Lai Matthew Ambrosio Aditya Kesari Jay Patel Zachary Fitch Josue Chery Patricia Nicolato Vigneshwar Kasirajan Zubair A. Hashmi Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background As COVID‐19 becomes endemic, evaluating COVID‐19+ donors for heart transplantation (HT) remains important. We assessed long‐term outcomes using national data and propensity‐matched analysis. Methods All adults (>18 years) undergoing HT between 4/2020 and 9/2024 were identified in the UNOS database. They were stratified into COVID‐19+ versus –, defined by either a positive nucleic acid or antigen test within 7 days of HT. Groups were then 3:1 nearest propensity score matched. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Mortality risk was assessed using Cox regression models. Results A total of 879 recipients of COVID‐19– hearts were matched with 293 recipients of COVID‐19+ hearts. We found no significant differences in 3‐year landmark survival between cohorts ( p  = 0.23). Rates of acute rejection ( p  = 0.15), length of hospital stay (LOS) ( p  > 0.9), and postoperative stroke ( p  = 0.53) did not differ significantly between groups. However, dialysis (17% vs. 12%, p  = 0.04) and primary graft dysfunction rates at 24‐h post‐HT were significantly higher in COVID‐19+ heart recipients (5.5% vs. 1.8%, p  = 0.01). Donor COVID‐19+ status was not significantly associated with mortality risk (HR 1.01, p  = 0.66). COVID‐19+ donor HTs in recent years (2022–2024) were associated with decreased mortality risk (HR 0.82, p  = 0.02), rates of acute rejection ( p  < 0.001), LOS ( p  = 0.01), and dialysis (18% vs. 8.9%, p  = 0.03). Conclusions COVID‐19+ hearts demonstrate adequate long‐term outcomes, particularly in recent years. Future studies should assess the impact of donor vaccination to optimize survival benefits. 10.1111/ctr.70439 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70439
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70439
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Evolving Long‐Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using COVID‐19 Positive Donors
Ye In Christopher Kwon
Brian Bao
Jack Guiry
David T. Zhu
Alan Lai
Matthew Ambrosio
Aditya Kesari
Jay Patel
Zachary Fitch
Josue Chery
Patricia Nicolato
Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Zubair A. Hashmi
Clinical Transplantation
Evolving Long‐Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using COVID‐19 Positive Donors Ye In Christopher Kwon Brian Bao Jack Guiry David T. Zhu Alan Lai Matthew Ambrosio Aditya Kesari Jay Patel Zachary Fitch Josue Chery Patricia Nicolato Vigneshwar Kasirajan Zubair A. Hashmi Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background As COVID‐19 becomes endemic, evaluating COVID‐19+ donors for heart transplantation (HT) remains important. We assessed long‐term outcomes using national data and propensity‐matched analysis. Methods All adults (>18 years) undergoing HT between 4/2020 and 9/2024 were identified in the UNOS database. They were stratified into COVID‐19+ versus –, defined by either a positive nucleic acid or antigen test within 7 days of HT. Groups were then 3:1 nearest propensity score matched. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Mortality risk was assessed using Cox regression models. Results A total of 879 recipients of COVID‐19– hearts were matched with 293 recipients of COVID‐19+ hearts. We found no significant differences in 3‐year landmark survival between cohorts ( p  = 0.23). Rates of acute rejection ( p  = 0.15), length of hospital stay (LOS) ( p  > 0.9), and postoperative stroke ( p  = 0.53) did not differ significantly between groups. However, dialysis (17% vs. 12%, p  = 0.04) and primary graft dysfunction rates at 24‐h post‐HT were significantly higher in COVID‐19+ heart recipients (5.5% vs. 1.8%, p  = 0.01). Donor COVID‐19+ status was not significantly associated with mortality risk (HR 1.01, p  = 0.66). COVID‐19+ donor HTs in recent years (2022–2024) were associated with decreased mortality risk (HR 0.82, p  = 0.02), rates of acute rejection ( p  < 0.001), LOS ( p  = 0.01), and dialysis (18% vs. 8.9%, p  = 0.03). Conclusions COVID‐19+ hearts demonstrate adequate long‐term outcomes, particularly in recent years. Future studies should assess the impact of donor vaccination to optimize survival benefits. 10.1111/ctr.70439 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
title Evolving Long‐Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using COVID‐19 Positive Donors
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70439