High Incidence of Undiagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients With Metabolic‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Emily A. Leven, Ishaan Dharia, Natalia Schmidt, Haley Waite, Pu Ni, M. Isabel Fiel, Emre Altinmakas, Deborah Feldman, Thomas D. Schiano, Lauren T. Grinspan
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867010194766036992
author Emily A. Leven
Ishaan Dharia
Natalia Schmidt
Haley Waite
Pu Ni
M. Isabel Fiel
Emre Altinmakas
Deborah Feldman
Thomas D. Schiano
Lauren T. Grinspan
author_facet Emily A. Leven
Ishaan Dharia
Natalia Schmidt
Haley Waite
Pu Ni
M. Isabel Fiel
Emre Altinmakas
Deborah Feldman
Thomas D. Schiano
Lauren T. Grinspan
Emily A. Leven
Ishaan Dharia
Natalia Schmidt
Haley Waite
Pu Ni
M. Isabel Fiel
Emre Altinmakas
Deborah Feldman
Thomas D. Schiano
Lauren T. Grinspan
collection Wiley Open Access
contents High Incidence of Undiagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients With Metabolic‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Emily A. Leven Ishaan Dharia Natalia Schmidt Haley Waite Pu Ni M. Isabel Fiel Emre Altinmakas Deborah Feldman Thomas D. Schiano Lauren T. Grinspan Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background A minority of liver transplant (LT) recipients are not diagnosed with HCC (u‐HCC) until their explanted liver is examined. The primary aim of this study was to examine HCC screening before LT in patients with u‐HCC compared to those with known HCC (k‐HCC). Secondary aims included assessment of inter‐reader variability of diagnostic imaging used for HCC screening; predictors of u‐HCC; and post‐LT outcomes in u‐HCC. Methods A single center retrospective review of patients with HCC on explant from 2012‐2023 was performed. A randomized subset of imaging studies from patients with k‐HCC and u‐HCC was reevaluated by two independent, blinded radiologists and inter‐reader concordance was measured. Results Thirty‐seven (7.8%) patients had u‐HCC, of whom 26 (70.3%) underwent contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 11 (29.7%) underwent computed tomography with delayed contrast phase (73% within 6 months of LT). Patients with metabolic liver disease and steatohepatitic HCC were more likely to have u‐HCC (32% vs 16%, p = 0.01; 19% vs 7%, p = 0.01, respectively). Thirty‐two patients with u‐HCC had no suspicious lesions noted on imaging. 60% of all studies with second evaluation by blinded radiologists had concordant findings compared to 44% in metabolic liver disease. Conclusions Patients with metabolic liver disease may be at higher risk of u‐HCC compared to other etiologies of liver disease despite regular, contrast‐enhanced, cross‐sectional imaging. One possible explanation for this is the difficulty of HCC detection in metabolic liver disease, as demonstrated by greater likelihood of inter‐reader discordance in imaging assessment in these patients. Keywords (Index Medicus) 10.1111/ctr.70506 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.70506
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_ctr_70506
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle High Incidence of Undiagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients With Metabolic‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Emily A. Leven
Ishaan Dharia
Natalia Schmidt
Haley Waite
Pu Ni
M. Isabel Fiel
Emre Altinmakas
Deborah Feldman
Thomas D. Schiano
Lauren T. Grinspan
Clinical Transplantation
High Incidence of Undiagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients With Metabolic‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Emily A. Leven Ishaan Dharia Natalia Schmidt Haley Waite Pu Ni M. Isabel Fiel Emre Altinmakas Deborah Feldman Thomas D. Schiano Lauren T. Grinspan Clinical Transplantation ABSTRACT Background A minority of liver transplant (LT) recipients are not diagnosed with HCC (u‐HCC) until their explanted liver is examined. The primary aim of this study was to examine HCC screening before LT in patients with u‐HCC compared to those with known HCC (k‐HCC). Secondary aims included assessment of inter‐reader variability of diagnostic imaging used for HCC screening; predictors of u‐HCC; and post‐LT outcomes in u‐HCC. Methods A single center retrospective review of patients with HCC on explant from 2012‐2023 was performed. A randomized subset of imaging studies from patients with k‐HCC and u‐HCC was reevaluated by two independent, blinded radiologists and inter‐reader concordance was measured. Results Thirty‐seven (7.8%) patients had u‐HCC, of whom 26 (70.3%) underwent contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 11 (29.7%) underwent computed tomography with delayed contrast phase (73% within 6 months of LT). Patients with metabolic liver disease and steatohepatitic HCC were more likely to have u‐HCC (32% vs 16%, p = 0.01; 19% vs 7%, p = 0.01, respectively). Thirty‐two patients with u‐HCC had no suspicious lesions noted on imaging. 60% of all studies with second evaluation by blinded radiologists had concordant findings compared to 44% in metabolic liver disease. Conclusions Patients with metabolic liver disease may be at higher risk of u‐HCC compared to other etiologies of liver disease despite regular, contrast‐enhanced, cross‐sectional imaging. One possible explanation for this is the difficulty of HCC detection in metabolic liver disease, as demonstrated by greater likelihood of inter‐reader discordance in imaging assessment in these patients. Keywords (Index Medicus) 10.1111/ctr.70506 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title High Incidence of Undiagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients With Metabolic‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
topic Clinical Transplantation
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70506