Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luana Miyahira Makita, Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves, Angela Maria Sandini Corso, Vinícius Salles Alves, Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima, Aishwarya Koppanatham, Pedro André Kowacs, Elcio Juliato Piovesan
Format: Artículo Open Access
Published: Wiley 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.14921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867003878869827585
author Luana Miyahira Makita
Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann
Rafael Reis de Oliveira
Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves
Angela Maria Sandini Corso
Vinícius Salles Alves
Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima
Aishwarya Koppanatham
Pedro André Kowacs
Elcio Juliato Piovesan
author_facet Luana Miyahira Makita
Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann
Rafael Reis de Oliveira
Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves
Angela Maria Sandini Corso
Vinícius Salles Alves
Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima
Aishwarya Koppanatham
Pedro André Kowacs
Elcio Juliato Piovesan
Luana Miyahira Makita
Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann
Rafael Reis de Oliveira
Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves
Angela Maria Sandini Corso
Vinícius Salles Alves
Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima
Aishwarya Koppanatham
Pedro André Kowacs
Elcio Juliato Piovesan
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension‐related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Luana Miyahira Makita Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann Rafael Reis de Oliveira Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves Angela Maria Sandini Corso Vinícius Salles Alves Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima Aishwarya Koppanatham Pedro André Kowacs Elcio Juliato Piovesan Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain Abstract Objectives/Background We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence on the effects of erenumab on systemic blood pressure (BP) in patients with migraine (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42024571056). US Prescribing Information for erenumab was updated to include the potential risk of hypertension, although randomized trials did not link it previously. The association of this monoclonal antibody with an elevated vascular risk remains uncertain. Methods Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases were searched up to June 18, 2024 for studies examining the impact of erenumab on BP in patients with migraine. I 2 statistics and prediction intervals (PIs) were applied to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used to explore it. Data were collected using mean difference (MD) or proportion of events. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results Systolic (MD = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.02 to 2.73, p  = 0.370, I 2  = 63%) and diastolic (MD = 1.33, 95% CI = −0.05 to 2.72, p  = 0.060, I 2  = 69%) BP measures did not significantly differ between after and before erenumab treatment. This lack of significant difference persisted at 3 and 12 months. The leave‐one‐out technique did not change heterogeneity. The proportion of participants presenting worsening BP appears to be 22.04% (95% CI = 11.12–38.98, PI = 0.54–93.60), with 56.40% corresponding to nonhypertensive individuals at baseline. The incidence of patients starting antihypertensive medications during the study was 3.96% (95% CI = 1.30–11.42, PI = 0.02–90.04), of which 62.88% corresponded to nonhypertensive patients at baseline. Conclusion We did not find an association of erenumab with significant increases in systemic BP. There is a considerable degree of fragility in the current evidence available. The decision to prescribe erenumab, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities and risk factors for hypertension, must be made weighing the risks and benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. 10.1111/head.14921 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/head.14921
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_head_14921
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension‐related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Luana Miyahira Makita
Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann
Rafael Reis de Oliveira
Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves
Angela Maria Sandini Corso
Vinícius Salles Alves
Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima
Aishwarya Koppanatham
Pedro André Kowacs
Elcio Juliato Piovesan
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension‐related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Luana Miyahira Makita Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann Rafael Reis de Oliveira Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves Angela Maria Sandini Corso Vinícius Salles Alves Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima Aishwarya Koppanatham Pedro André Kowacs Elcio Juliato Piovesan Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain Abstract Objectives/Background We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence on the effects of erenumab on systemic blood pressure (BP) in patients with migraine (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42024571056). US Prescribing Information for erenumab was updated to include the potential risk of hypertension, although randomized trials did not link it previously. The association of this monoclonal antibody with an elevated vascular risk remains uncertain. Methods Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases were searched up to June 18, 2024 for studies examining the impact of erenumab on BP in patients with migraine. I 2 statistics and prediction intervals (PIs) were applied to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used to explore it. Data were collected using mean difference (MD) or proportion of events. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results Systolic (MD = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.02 to 2.73, p  = 0.370, I 2  = 63%) and diastolic (MD = 1.33, 95% CI = −0.05 to 2.72, p  = 0.060, I 2  = 69%) BP measures did not significantly differ between after and before erenumab treatment. This lack of significant difference persisted at 3 and 12 months. The leave‐one‐out technique did not change heterogeneity. The proportion of participants presenting worsening BP appears to be 22.04% (95% CI = 11.12–38.98, PI = 0.54–93.60), with 56.40% corresponding to nonhypertensive individuals at baseline. The incidence of patients starting antihypertensive medications during the study was 3.96% (95% CI = 1.30–11.42, PI = 0.02–90.04), of which 62.88% corresponded to nonhypertensive patients at baseline. Conclusion We did not find an association of erenumab with significant increases in systemic BP. There is a considerable degree of fragility in the current evidence available. The decision to prescribe erenumab, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities and risk factors for hypertension, must be made weighing the risks and benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. 10.1111/head.14921 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension‐related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
url https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.14921