Safety analysis of gepants for migraine treatment: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS ) database

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hui Chen, Yan Li
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867016216493686784
author Hui Chen
Yan Li
author_facet Hui Chen
Yan Li
Hui Chen
Yan Li
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Safety analysis of gepants for migraine treatment: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS ) database Hui Chen Yan Li Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain Abstract Background Gepants, a novel class of calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, are increasingly used for acute and preventive migraine treatment; however, comprehensive real‐world safety data are limited. This study is a retrospective disproportionality analysis that evaluates the safety profile of rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reports from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in patients with migraine. Methods AE reports for rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant from January 2020 to March 2025 were retrieved from the FAERS database using standardized drug names and migraine‐related indications. Disproportionality analyses were employed to detect AE signals, classified by system organ class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) using MedDRA 27.0. Results A total of 84, 55, 80, and 31 AE signals were identified for rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant, respectively. Nausea, a gastrointestinal disorder, was the only AE common to all four gepants (4.07%–5.2%). Oral gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant) primarily showed gastrointestinal and nervous system AEs, including constipation (atogepant, reporting odds ratio {ROR} = 11.39 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 10.21–12.71]) and dizziness. Zavegepant was associated with respiratory AEs, notably nasal discomfort (ROR = 718.38 [95% CI: 552.33–934.35]). Potential signals related to pregnancy outcomes were detected for rimegepant and ubrogepant, warranting cautious interpretation and further investigation. Conclusion Gepants display distinct AE profiles, with oral agents linked to gastrointestinal and neurological effects and intranasal zavegepant associated with respiratory irritation. Continued post‐marketing surveillance is essential to inform personalized migraine management and guide future CGRP‐targeted drug development. 10.1111/head.70049 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/head.70049
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_head_70049
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2026
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Safety analysis of gepants for migraine treatment: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS ) database
Hui Chen
Yan Li
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Safety analysis of gepants for migraine treatment: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS ) database Hui Chen Yan Li Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain Abstract Background Gepants, a novel class of calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, are increasingly used for acute and preventive migraine treatment; however, comprehensive real‐world safety data are limited. This study is a retrospective disproportionality analysis that evaluates the safety profile of rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reports from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in patients with migraine. Methods AE reports for rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant from January 2020 to March 2025 were retrieved from the FAERS database using standardized drug names and migraine‐related indications. Disproportionality analyses were employed to detect AE signals, classified by system organ class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) using MedDRA 27.0. Results A total of 84, 55, 80, and 31 AE signals were identified for rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant, and zavegepant, respectively. Nausea, a gastrointestinal disorder, was the only AE common to all four gepants (4.07%–5.2%). Oral gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant) primarily showed gastrointestinal and nervous system AEs, including constipation (atogepant, reporting odds ratio {ROR} = 11.39 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 10.21–12.71]) and dizziness. Zavegepant was associated with respiratory AEs, notably nasal discomfort (ROR = 718.38 [95% CI: 552.33–934.35]). Potential signals related to pregnancy outcomes were detected for rimegepant and ubrogepant, warranting cautious interpretation and further investigation. Conclusion Gepants display distinct AE profiles, with oral agents linked to gastrointestinal and neurological effects and intranasal zavegepant associated with respiratory irritation. Continued post‐marketing surveillance is essential to inform personalized migraine management and guide future CGRP‐targeted drug development. 10.1111/head.70049 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Safety analysis of gepants for migraine treatment: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS ) database
topic Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
url https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.70049