Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo Open Access |
| Publié: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70239 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- Navigating Power Imbalances and Stigma in Mental Healthcare. Patient‐Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Shared Decision‐Making in Mental Health Care, a Qualitative Meta‐Summary Lien Mertens Joris Vandenberghe Geertruida Bekkering Karin Hannes Nicolas Delvaux Pieter Van Bostraeten Jasmien Jaeken Bert Aertgeerts Mieke Vermandere Health Expectations ABSTRACTBackgroundThe use of shared decision‐making (SDM) in mental healthcare has been viewed as at least as important as its use in non‐mental healthcare settings, but it still does not routinely take place in this setting. To further explore SDM processes with people with lived experience, we provide a qualitative meta‐summary on patient‐reported barriers and facilitators to participation in SDM within the context of mental healthcare.MethodsWithin the set of selected studies for a larger qualitative meta‐summary, using five databases, we selected the studies that had surveyed patients with mental illness for further analysis in this paper. Search terms were based on the concepts: ‘decision making’, ‘patient participation’, ‘patient perceptions’ and ‘study design’ of patient reporting, including patient surveys, interviews and focus groups.ResultsOut of the 90 studies that had been selected for the larger review, we selected 13 articles concerning mental illness for more detailed analysis in this review. In total, we identified 29 different influencing factors and we found 6 major barriers: ‘Lack of choice’, ‘Not being respected as a person’, ‘Feeling stigma from physician’, ‘Disease burden’, ‘Power imbalance’ and ‘Low self‐efficacy to participate’. ‘Clear information provision about options’, ‘Being respected as a person, being taken into account’, ‘Good physician‐patient relationship’ and ‘Belief in the importance of one's own role’ were the main facilitators.ConclusionsStigma and self‐stigma still seem to persist in mental healthcare and continue to suppress patients' self‐efficacy to participate in SDM in this setting. There is much discussion of inclusion and diversity worldwide, and these themes are just as topical for patients with mental health problems. Further work seems necessary to eradicate all stigma and self‐stigma in this setting when striving for care that could be ‘as shared as possible’.Patient and Public ContributionThe authors wish to thank Mr. Walter Geuens, a person with lived experience in mental healthcare, for his careful reading and thorough feedback on the final paper. 10.1111/hex.70239 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/