Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Fuente: Wiley Open Access
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Karol Quelal Analuisa, Namrata Arya, Teodora Donisan, David Harmon, Mohamad Alkhouli, Alan M Sugrue, Yong‐Mei Cha, Eleid F Mackram, Abhishek J Deshmukh
Format: Artículo Open Access
Veröffentlicht: Wiley 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867020263789428736
author Karol Quelal Analuisa
Namrata Arya
Teodora Donisan
David Harmon
Mohamad Alkhouli
Alan M Sugrue
Yong‐Mei Cha
Eleid F Mackram
Abhishek J Deshmukh
author_facet Karol Quelal Analuisa
Namrata Arya
Teodora Donisan
David Harmon
Mohamad Alkhouli
Alan M Sugrue
Yong‐Mei Cha
Eleid F Mackram
Abhishek J Deshmukh
Karol Quelal Analuisa
Namrata Arya
Teodora Donisan
David Harmon
Mohamad Alkhouli
Alan M Sugrue
Yong‐Mei Cha
Eleid F Mackram
Abhishek J Deshmukh
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Karol Quelal Analuisa Namrata Arya Teodora Donisan David Harmon Mohamad Alkhouli Alan M Sugrue Yong‐Mei Cha Eleid F Mackram Abhishek J Deshmukh Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology ABSTRACT Background Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV‐TAVR) is increasingly used to treat structural valve degeneration. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet predictors specific to ViV‐TAVR remain poorly defined. Objective To identify clinical and procedural predictors of PPI in patients undergoing ViV‐TAVR. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive ViV‐TAVR cases at the Mayo Clinic from 2012 to 2022. Clinical, ECG, procedural data and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding. Predictors of PPI were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 261 patients, 24 (9.2%) underwent PPI. Balloon‐expandable valves were used in 66.7% and self‐expanding valves in 33.3%. Predictors of PPI included Preprocedural bifascicular block (OR 12.15, 95% CI: 2.52–68.89, p  = 0.003), greater septal implantation depth (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04–1.65, p  = 0.019), and post‐procedural new left (OR 23.56, 95% CI: 4.91–48.52, p  = 0.0004) and right bundle branch blocks (OR 24.4, 95% CI: 3.82–30.51, p  = 0.001). Aortic regurgitation as the mechanism of prosthetic valve failure was associated with reduced PPI odds (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p  = 0.014). Pacing requirement—defined as > 90% ventricular pacing—increased from 25% at 3 months to 56.25% at 12 months. At a median follow‐up of 962.5 days (IQR 481.5–1555.3), adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the PPI group (aOR 9.4, 95% CI: 1.9–60.4, p  = 0.028). Conclusion Bifascicular block, greater septal depth, and new bundle branch blocks predict PPI post‐ViV‐TAVR, while aortic regurgitation appears protective. Risk stratification and procedural planning are critical. 10.1111/jce.70139 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.70139
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1111_jce_70139
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2025
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Karol Quelal Analuisa
Namrata Arya
Teodora Donisan
David Harmon
Mohamad Alkhouli
Alan M Sugrue
Yong‐Mei Cha
Eleid F Mackram
Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Karol Quelal Analuisa Namrata Arya Teodora Donisan David Harmon Mohamad Alkhouli Alan M Sugrue Yong‐Mei Cha Eleid F Mackram Abhishek J Deshmukh Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology ABSTRACT Background Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV‐TAVR) is increasingly used to treat structural valve degeneration. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet predictors specific to ViV‐TAVR remain poorly defined. Objective To identify clinical and procedural predictors of PPI in patients undergoing ViV‐TAVR. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive ViV‐TAVR cases at the Mayo Clinic from 2012 to 2022. Clinical, ECG, procedural data and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding. Predictors of PPI were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 261 patients, 24 (9.2%) underwent PPI. Balloon‐expandable valves were used in 66.7% and self‐expanding valves in 33.3%. Predictors of PPI included Preprocedural bifascicular block (OR 12.15, 95% CI: 2.52–68.89, p  = 0.003), greater septal implantation depth (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04–1.65, p  = 0.019), and post‐procedural new left (OR 23.56, 95% CI: 4.91–48.52, p  = 0.0004) and right bundle branch blocks (OR 24.4, 95% CI: 3.82–30.51, p  = 0.001). Aortic regurgitation as the mechanism of prosthetic valve failure was associated with reduced PPI odds (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p  = 0.014). Pacing requirement—defined as > 90% ventricular pacing—increased from 25% at 3 months to 56.25% at 12 months. At a median follow‐up of 962.5 days (IQR 481.5–1555.3), adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the PPI group (aOR 9.4, 95% CI: 1.9–60.4, p  = 0.028). Conclusion Bifascicular block, greater septal depth, and new bundle branch blocks predict PPI post‐ViV‐TAVR, while aortic regurgitation appears protective. Risk stratification and procedural planning are critical. 10.1111/jce.70139 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
topic Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.70139