‘Nothing Works’? A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Different Types of Return and Readmission Frameworks on EU Member States' Enforced Return Rates
Fuente:
Wiley Open Access
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo Open Access |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867014799628435456 |
|---|---|
| author | Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer |
| author_facet | Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer |
| collection | Wiley Open Access |
| contents | ‘Nothing Works’? A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Different Types of Return and Readmission Frameworks on EU Member States' Enforced Return Rates Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Abstract Recent decades have seen a significant rise in return and readmission frameworks. Scholars note a trend towards informalization, incentivization and Europeanization. Yet, no study has thoroughly evaluated with advanced regression techniques how the resulting frameworks impact migrant return and whether different types of frameworks affect migrant return differentially. In this study, we use Cassarino's inventory of return and readmission frameworks, data from the European Migration Network and Eurostat return data. We employ fixed‐effects Poisson regression techniques to examine how various types of return and readmission frameworks influence the enforced return rates (2008–2021). Our findings hold significant implications for academic research and policy‐making. Whilst bilateral return and readmission frameworks and EU Return and Readmission Agreements (EURAs) linked to visa facilitation arrangements show limited positive effects on enforced migrant return rates, non‐binding EU‐wide frameworks appear to reduce such rates. These findings are interpreted from the perspectives of rational choice and sociological institutionalism. 10.1111/jcms.13744 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jcms.13744 |
| format | Artículo Open Access |
| id | wiley_oa_10_1111_jcms_13744 |
| institution | Wiley Open Access |
| license_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | wiley_oa |
| spellingShingle | ‘Nothing Works’? A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Different Types of Return and Readmission Frameworks on EU Member States' Enforced Return Rates Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies ‘Nothing Works’? A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Different Types of Return and Readmission Frameworks on EU Member States' Enforced Return Rates Ana Maria Torres Chedraui Arjen Leerkes Mieke Maliepaard Manon van der Meer JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Abstract Recent decades have seen a significant rise in return and readmission frameworks. Scholars note a trend towards informalization, incentivization and Europeanization. Yet, no study has thoroughly evaluated with advanced regression techniques how the resulting frameworks impact migrant return and whether different types of frameworks affect migrant return differentially. In this study, we use Cassarino's inventory of return and readmission frameworks, data from the European Migration Network and Eurostat return data. We employ fixed‐effects Poisson regression techniques to examine how various types of return and readmission frameworks influence the enforced return rates (2008–2021). Our findings hold significant implications for academic research and policy‐making. Whilst bilateral return and readmission frameworks and EU Return and Readmission Agreements (EURAs) linked to visa facilitation arrangements show limited positive effects on enforced migrant return rates, non‐binding EU‐wide frameworks appear to reduce such rates. These findings are interpreted from the perspectives of rational choice and sociological institutionalism. 10.1111/jcms.13744 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title | ‘Nothing Works’? A Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Different Types of Return and Readmission Frameworks on EU Member States' Enforced Return Rates |
| topic | JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies |
| url | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13744 |